ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Proliant DL580 G2 - Clustering Issue

Paul Sinker
Occasional Visitor

Proliant DL580 G2 - Clustering Issue

Hi All,

Does any one experienced this problem?

I have two Proliant DL580 G2's with clustering and used Windows 2003 Enterprise Ed Spk1.

The os eventvwr, system log, presented this issue:

Event Type: Warning
Event Source: Foundation Agents
Event Category: Events
Event ID: 1171
Date: 10/07/2008
Time: 1:16:06 AM
User: N/A
Computer: Hostname001
Description:
Cluster Agent: The cluster service on Hostname002 has become degraded.


Event Type: Warning
Event Source: Foundation Agents
Event Category: Alerter
Event ID: 770
Date: 10/07/2008
Time: 1:17:18 AM
User: N/A
Computer: Hostname002
Description:
The Host Remote Alerter detected an error while attempting to retrieve data from key = CompaqHost\Cluster\Component\ResourceTable in the registry. The data contains the error code.
Data:
0000: ea 00 00 00 ê...


Event Type: Error
Event Source: Foundation Agents
Event Category: Events
Event ID: 1172
Date: 10/07/2008
Time: 1:40:08 AM
User: N/A
Computer: Hostname001
Description:
Cluster Agent: The cluster service on Hostname002 has failed.
[SNMP TRAP: 15004 in CPQCLUS.MIB]


Main Cluster Server 001

IP Address: SW Version: 5.2
SW Vendor: Microsoft(R) Cluster service CSD Version: Service Pack 1

Cluster Agent Software
Name Version Description
CPQCLUS.DLL 7.70 Compaq Cluster Agent
HOSTMIB.DLL 7.70 Foundation Agents


Any one have any ideas?

Cheers,

Paul

1 REPLY
Blazhev_1
Honored Contributor

Re: Proliant DL580 G2 - Clustering Issue

Hi,

actually it is known problem :

http://forums12.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1215795054516+28353475&threadId=566420

and

http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=990677&admit=109447626+1215795279241+28353475

As a summary : specific versions of PSP are showing this behaviour in some circumstances.
There is a registry key that seems to solve the problem or to disable the performance monitor, better check both threads..