- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Re: SCSI connectors and RAID levels on the ML350
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-26-2004 09:48 AM
тАО04-26-2004 09:48 AM
The server will be acting as file/print server and will be running Exchange server and SQL server and have a maximum of 10 simultaneous users.
I would like to configure it something like this:
2 x 36GB in RAID1 configuration.
3 (or more) x 36GB in RAID5 configuration.
1 x 36GB as a hot spare.
Is this possible and advisable?
(According to the specs, the ML350 comes with a "Dual Channel Wide Ultra3 SCSI Adapter" and a SA641 RAID controller but I have not been able to find information on the SA641).
Furthermore, I want to be able to attach a newly purchased HP DAT72 external tape drive to the server. This tape drive is Ultra160 SCSI.
Will that work well?
Is the ML350 the right server for this purpose after all?
Best regards
Erik
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-26-2004 10:42 AM
тАО04-26-2004 10:42 AM
Re: SCSI connectors and RAID levels on the ML350
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-26-2004 11:02 AM
тАО04-26-2004 11:02 AM
Re: SCSI connectors and RAID levels on the ML350
I now realize that the SA641 is only one channel, so this will not allow for having RAID1 and RAID5 at the same time.
So, I guess what I need is a ML350 with a dual channel SCSI adapter and an SA642 RAID controller (dual channel) instead. Would this configuration allow me to have an external tape drive along with the RAID1/RAID5 combination that I want?
Best regards,
Erik
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-26-2004 12:06 PM
тАО04-26-2004 12:06 PM
Re: SCSI connectors and RAID levels on the ML350
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-26-2004 05:23 PM
тАО04-26-2004 05:23 PM
Re: SCSI connectors and RAID levels on the ML350
Hi Vijay is right we can have raid1 and raid5 on once channel also. Go through the following user guide it will help you explaing the ACU used for manuplating and creating raid on server. So can get brief idea abou the RAID on Proliant servers. Where as feature are controller specifics only.
ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/supportinformation/techpubs/user_reference_guides/239449-004_rev4_us.pdf
regard,
Prashant S.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-26-2004 08:50 PM
тАО04-26-2004 08:50 PM
Re: SCSI connectors and RAID levels on the ML350
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-28-2004 12:40 AM
тАО04-28-2004 12:40 AM
Solution- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-28-2004 12:51 AM
тАО04-28-2004 12:51 AM
Re: SCSI connectors and RAID levels on the ML350
You're right, the RAID1 will primarily be used for the OS (Windows 2003).
The server will be running SQL Server and Exchange Server, and Terminal Services will be enabled (all users will be running thin clients).
Would it be advisable to have the SQL database on the RAID5 and the SQL logfiles on the RAID1 ?
Do you have any suggestions on how I could set up the server in a better way?
Best regards
Erik
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-28-2004 01:46 AM
тАО04-28-2004 01:46 AM
Re: SCSI connectors and RAID levels on the ML350
But consider this - The bottleneck in storage is the drive. To maximize through-put you add spindles (hard-drives).
On the Smart controllers you can create virtual RAID sets - ONLY HP Smart RAID controllers can do this no other vendor can do this!!!
Ground rules:
1. Stop thinking of RAID sets as drives in a set. I mean it, stop it right now.
2. To do this you need to use an EVEN number of drives (don't count the hot spare).
3. The drives must be the same size.
For example.
I need 8GB of RAID 1 and 96GB of RAID 5.
I would use four drives (see rule #2).
Place all the drives in an array (array 'A').
This will create the total raw storage of (4x36) 144GB.
Create a logical drive that's 8GB in size RAID 1 (this will use 16GB of RAW space thus 144-16=128).
Create a logical drive that's 96GB in size RAID 5 (this will use 128MB of RAW space thus 128MB RAW / 4 Drives = 32MB, The overhead for RAID 5 is the space of one drive so 3x32=96).
Doing this has just maximized the spindle count for both RAID sets.
Something to think about.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-28-2004 03:19 AM
тАО04-28-2004 03:19 AM
Re: SCSI connectors and RAID levels on the ML350
> spindle count for both RAID sets.
> Something to think about.
I think I get the point. But your solution rises a new question: How does the concept you suggest (i.e. using "virtual RAIDs") affect the server's ability to withstand failing disks?
Since each and every disk participate in the array and thereby also in the RAID1/RAID5, a failing disks will affect both RAIDs - or ...?
Best regards,
Erik