Security Research
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 

The Value of Low Priority Issues

joy_forsythe on ‎02-28-2014 05:12 PM

The big news at the beginning of this week, just as we were all heading to the RSA conference, was a bug in the Apple implementation of SSL/TLS. I’ve been asked a few times whether HP Fortify SCA finds this issue – and it does. The interesting thing is how we identify it.


We flag the lines following the second “goto fail” statement as Dead Code. Static analysis can’t interpret the intention of the code writer, but we can find places where developers fail to follow good practices. People dismiss these issues as noise – how can dead code hurt them? Most of the time, it’s just code that is purposely no longer reachable. However, sometimes it’s an indication of bigger problems and shouldn’t be dismissed, especially in a sensitive area of a program.


After all the publicity around this issue, I was surprised to hear at least one RSA talk refer to low priority automated tool results as noise and advocate for dismissing them wholesale. This Apple bug proves that is not a good policy for any organization. Instead, the default priority of the results should be combined with knowledge of the purpose and sensitivity of the application being analyzed.

0 Kudos
About the Author


Nov 29 - Dec 1
Discover 2016 London
Learn how to thrive in a world of digital transformation at our biggest event of the year, Discover 2016 London, November 29 - December 1.
Read more
Each Month in 2016
Software Expert Days - 2016
Join us online to talk directly with our Software experts during online Expert Days. Find information here about past, current, and upcoming Expert Da...
Read more
View all