- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Serviceguard
- >
- Re: MC/Service Guard and ESS 2105
-
- Forums
-
Blogs
- Hybrid Cloud
- Edge
- Data & AI
- Working in Tech
- AI Insights
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- Behind the scenes at Labs
- Careers in Tech
- HPE Storage Tech Insiders
- Inspiring Progress
- IoT at the Edge
- My Learning Certification
- OEM Solutions
- Servers: The Right Compute
- Shifting to Software-Defined
- Telecom IQ
- Transforming IT
- HPE Blog, Austria, Germany & Switzerland
- Blog HPE, France
- HPE Blog, Italy
- HPE Blog, Japan
- HPE Blog, Russia
- HPE Blog, UK & Ireland
- Blogs
-
Quick Links
- Community
- Getting Started
- FAQ
- Ranking Overview
- Rules of Participation
- Contact
- Email us
- Tell us what you think
- Information Libraries
- Integrated Systems
- Networking
- Servers
- Storage
- Other HPE Sites
- Support Center
- Aruba Airheads Community
- Enterprise.nxt
- HPE Dev Community
- Cloud28+ Community
- Marketplace
-
Forums
-
Blogs
-
Information
-
English
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-11-2002 08:07 AM
11-11-2002 08:07 AM
Thanks,
Doug
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-11-2002 08:34 AM
11-11-2002 08:34 AM
SolutionWe have a cluster here where the disk storage is an IBM Shark (ESS). If you are going to use an ESS in an MC/ServiceGuard cluster, you won't be able to use the SDD drivers because those drivers group the PVs and present them to HP-UX as vpath## devices and MC/ServiceGuard absolutely doesn't like that. Been there, tried it, won't work. Which means that you'll have to try to balance out your data paths by alternating controllers when you layout your volume groups, which kind of turns it into just a great big JBOD.
JP
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2002 12:26 AM
11-12-2002 12:26 AM
Re: MC/Service Guard and ESS 2105
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2002 10:48 AM
11-13-2002 10:48 AM
Re: MC/Service Guard and ESS 2105
Doug,
We also are planning to do this with two L3000's in an MC/SG configuration. We currently have our K570 attached to our ESS, even on this box we are not using the IBM SDD driver, just PV Links.
- Justin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-29-2002 10:31 AM
11-29-2002 10:31 AM
Re: MC/Service Guard and ESS 2105
I successfully implemented MC/SG cluster using IBM ESS array (do not remember its model) and two K370 servers a year ago. Works fine but I did not use SDD, not event tried to.
Regards,
Zbigniew Klos
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-19-2002 03:07 PM
12-19-2002 03:07 PM
Re: MC/Service Guard and ESS 2105
I had been testing on ESS storage against Mc/SG cluster version 0s 11i on K . L and N class.
It depends on the level of code that you are on for your problems. If you need any further assistance on this on how to set it up and run it, let me know where i can help you with. HP/uX comes with PV link as multipathing, you can use it as a tool to exist you. SDD uses vpath, so when you import the vg to the secondary note, you need to change it from vpath to hdisk. Otherwise, it works fine.
hp2vp or vp2hd ....
That is only different...
like i said let me know if you have any more questions.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise International
- Communities
- HPE Blogs and Forum
© Copyright 2019 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP