- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: service guard VS. redhat cluster manager
Operating System - Linux
1753507
Members
5160
Online
108795
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-05-2005 10:38 PM
тАО03-05-2005 10:38 PM
service guard VS. redhat cluster manager
Hi,
I need to decide between using Hp service guard and redhat cluster suit on proliant DL380 servers running redhat enterprise linux V. 3.0, the shared storage is an HP EVA3000 box with secure path V. 3.0.
EVA 3000 specification indicates that EVA supports clustering with MC serviceguard for linux, and redhat cluster suit is not mentioned.
Have any one tried cluster manager with EVA3000 and securepath ?
I need to decide between using Hp service guard and redhat cluster suit on proliant DL380 servers running redhat enterprise linux V. 3.0, the shared storage is an HP EVA3000 box with secure path V. 3.0.
EVA 3000 specification indicates that EVA supports clustering with MC serviceguard for linux, and redhat cluster suit is not mentioned.
Have any one tried cluster manager with EVA3000 and securepath ?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-06-2005 02:12 AM
тАО03-06-2005 02:12 AM
Re: service guard VS. redhat cluster manager
I've had the opportunity to play with both your options, though not with an HP EVA3000 storage array.
My nod is that Serviceguard is better, primarily because of HP support. Its a better support organization when there are issues.
SEP
My nod is that Serviceguard is better, primarily because of HP support. Its a better support organization when there are issues.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-13-2005 11:48 PM
тАО06-13-2005 11:48 PM
Re: service guard VS. redhat cluster manager
Hi,
i am using HPUX, service guard and EVA3000.
it may be more expensive compare to Linux. we also have some Linux boxes running AS,ES V.3.0
Steven is right, HP support is the best(compare with Oracle,Redhat and some other third party vendors) to me RedHat support is not upto this professional level yet!.
Just an opinion.
Tom,
i am using HPUX, service guard and EVA3000.
it may be more expensive compare to Linux. we also have some Linux boxes running AS,ES V.3.0
Steven is right, HP support is the best(compare with Oracle,Redhat and some other third party vendors) to me RedHat support is not upto this professional level yet!.
Just an opinion.
Tom,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-21-2005 11:53 AM
тАО07-21-2005 11:53 AM
Re: service guard VS. redhat cluster manager
Hi,
I have tried using both, Redhat cluster suite as well as ServiceGuard and ServiceGuard is far far better than red hat cluster suite, infact there are a lot of known issues in Redhat.
You cant totaly trust on Redhat cluster suite and infact Redhat is promoting HP-Serviceguard.
Thanks
Srinivas K S
I have tried using both, Redhat cluster suite as well as ServiceGuard and ServiceGuard is far far better than red hat cluster suite, infact there are a lot of known issues in Redhat.
You cant totaly trust on Redhat cluster suite and infact Redhat is promoting HP-Serviceguard.
Thanks
Srinivas K S
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP