- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Data Protection and Retention
- >
- StoreEver Tape Storage
- >
- Re: DLT vs. LTOII
StoreEver Tape Storage
1753540
Members
5780
Online
108795
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-14-2006 03:06 PM
02-14-2006 03:06 PM
Re: DLT vs. LTOII
What kind of autoloader are you using?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-15-2006 09:31 AM
02-15-2006 09:31 AM
Re: DLT vs. LTOII
For the records:
> The DLT camp has the adavantage of being
> able to still read your old DLT tapes
> while bringing you the speed and
> capacity of its newer generation drives.
It depends on your defination of "old DLT" and "newer generation" drives. The latest drive is the SDLT600, and it will not read DLT40/70/80 tapes (only SDLT 220, SDLT320, and VS160).
> I think current generation DLTs now
> gives the LTO camp serious competition
> in the speed and capacity arenas.
SDLT600 = 300GB at 36MB/s native.
Ultrium960 = 400GB at 80MB/s native.
both transfer rates (and capacities) double at 2:1 compression.
Not sure if that's serious competition or not.
> The DLT camp has the adavantage of being
> able to still read your old DLT tapes
> while bringing you the speed and
> capacity of its newer generation drives.
It depends on your defination of "old DLT" and "newer generation" drives. The latest drive is the SDLT600, and it will not read DLT40/70/80 tapes (only SDLT 220, SDLT320, and VS160).
> I think current generation DLTs now
> gives the LTO camp serious competition
> in the speed and capacity arenas.
SDLT600 = 300GB at 36MB/s native.
Ultrium960 = 400GB at 80MB/s native.
both transfer rates (and capacities) double at 2:1 compression.
Not sure if that's serious competition or not.
The journey IS the reward.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP