- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Data Protection and Retention
- >
- StoreEver Tape Storage
- >
- Re: LTO Driver performance
StoreEver Tape Storage
1753602
Members
6586
Online
108797
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-05-2007 03:50 AM
тАО09-05-2007 03:50 AM
Re: LTO Driver performance
Thanks for the posting. The cables and terminator sound OK. Drivers and firmware "up to date" doesn't necessarily mean that they are the same as the ones we have tested here as Adaptec is free to roll both without notifying us. If you can post the revisions you are using we can compare it to what has been used for testing and if it isn't the same we can get those revisions into test.
I have seen a couple of cases where despite having all the right firmware, drivers, and cables, a few HBA's would never negotiation for U320 and it was traced to something specific to that HBA. I think it is possible for an HBA to have a weak transceiver and not be able to operate at U320 speeds with at least some devices.
I have seen a couple of cases where despite having all the right firmware, drivers, and cables, a few HBA's would never negotiation for U320 and it was traced to something specific to that HBA. I think it is possible for an HBA to have a weak transceiver and not be able to operate at U320 speeds with at least some devices.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-05-2007 05:35 AM
тАО09-05-2007 05:35 AM
Re: LTO Driver performance
Kim:
The problem was resolved because we had another device in the Ultra 320 adaptar, besides the tape backup. Because the 320 that we have is for only one device, we disconnect the other one (a CD-ROM) and the performance now is right.
I hope this could help you.
Best Regards
Luis Ramirez
The problem was resolved because we had another device in the Ultra 320 adaptar, besides the tape backup. Because the 320 that we have is for only one device, we disconnect the other one (a CD-ROM) and the performance now is right.
I hope this could help you.
Best Regards
Luis Ramirez
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-05-2007 11:00 AM
тАО09-05-2007 11:00 AM
Re: LTO Driver performance
Kim - In your post you indicate that you are using an Adaptec 39160 with an Ultrium 3 drive. That adapter is only a U160 card and will never run anything faster than that but Ultrium 3 drives recommend U320 so L&TT will always give a performance warning. If L&TT is saying that you are running 160 that is the best you are going to be able to do with that card and good enough virtually all of the time with Ultrium 3 but can impact performance on highly compressible data.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-06-2007 03:18 AM
тАО09-06-2007 03:18 AM
Re: LTO Driver performance
Hello Curtis and Lois
I have bee with the customer today, and it shows that they for some time ago have replaced the Adaptec controler. The new controler didn't support multiple LUN, so it seems to bee the reason.
I know that the 39160 only support 160 MB/s, but it is sitting in a DELL server, and that was what DELL recommended for their PCI bus - so thats the reason.(but the L&TT test showed 0,8 Kb/s!)
I'll tell you if the live tests shows if the problem is solved.
Thank you for your replies - it's inspiring with discussions :-)
I have bee with the customer today, and it shows that they for some time ago have replaced the Adaptec controler. The new controler didn't support multiple LUN, so it seems to bee the reason.
I know that the 39160 only support 160 MB/s, but it is sitting in a DELL server, and that was what DELL recommended for their PCI bus - so thats the reason.(but the L&TT test showed 0,8 Kb/s!)
I'll tell you if the live tests shows if the problem is solved.
Thank you for your replies - it's inspiring with discussions :-)
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP