- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Data Protection and Retention
- >
- StoreEver Tape Storage
- >
- Re: Surestore 215 (LTO 1) drive - low capacity
StoreEver Tape Storage
1753317
Members
5615
Online
108792
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-15-2008 06:16 AM
01-15-2008 06:16 AM
Surestore 215 (LTO 1) drive - low capacity
Thanks in advance... Here's our issue!
Our SureStore LTO-1 drive is currently only storing around 70-80GB onto our 100GB tapes (old & new.) In the past we have managed to get around 130GB onto these tapes with compression but this figure has dropped suddenly. The nature of the data has not changed considerably.
BackupExec 9.1 reports a "compression ratio" of ~0.8:1, which demonstrates that the tapes are failing to provide even their native capacity.
HP's LTT software reports the hardware compression as working, but the drive tests complain that there's a "large variation between channels" and sometimes fail.
We have used a cleaning cartridge to no discernable effect.
I have a number of questions:
1. If the LTT software is showing errors, does this confirm that our issue is not with BackupExec? - One of my colleagues contends that the drive seems to be okay because the compression reports as "working correctly" from LTT. Veritas reports the compression ratio as the ultimate total of data stored in relation to the tape's native capacity and I suspect that it's showing a loss of data due to a physical drive failure.
2. The channels error which appears in the logs seems to be undocumented. I couldn't find a mention of it in the LTT user guide or on the web. What does this mean, and it is a severe error?
3. Could this reduction in capacity indicate anything other than a physical issue with the drive?
4. Are there calibrations or other physical maintenance procedures we can perform to improve performance?
5. LTT reports that the drive should not be used anymore as a result of the drive test. How literally should that really be taken?
Our SureStore LTO-1 drive is currently only storing around 70-80GB onto our 100GB tapes (old & new.) In the past we have managed to get around 130GB onto these tapes with compression but this figure has dropped suddenly. The nature of the data has not changed considerably.
BackupExec 9.1 reports a "compression ratio" of ~0.8:1, which demonstrates that the tapes are failing to provide even their native capacity.
HP's LTT software reports the hardware compression as working, but the drive tests complain that there's a "large variation between channels" and sometimes fail.
We have used a cleaning cartridge to no discernable effect.
I have a number of questions:
1. If the LTT software is showing errors, does this confirm that our issue is not with BackupExec? - One of my colleagues contends that the drive seems to be okay because the compression reports as "working correctly" from LTT. Veritas reports the compression ratio as the ultimate total of data stored in relation to the tape's native capacity and I suspect that it's showing a loss of data due to a physical drive failure.
2. The channels error which appears in the logs seems to be undocumented. I couldn't find a mention of it in the LTT user guide or on the web. What does this mean, and it is a severe error?
3. Could this reduction in capacity indicate anything other than a physical issue with the drive?
4. Are there calibrations or other physical maintenance procedures we can perform to improve performance?
5. LTT reports that the drive should not be used anymore as a result of the drive test. How literally should that really be taken?
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-25-2008 02:32 PM
12-25-2008 02:32 PM
Re: Surestore 215 (LTO 1) drive - low capacity
Christopher,
It seems that you're not alone.
My LTO2 does exactly the same thing after a few months of very good service hours.
I've experienced a cooling problem in my server that raised the internal temperature to 55 °C (I'm french, sorry -;) - it might be the source of my problem. If so, these units are very fragile.
As I can find some second hand units on ebay at <$300 prices, I'm thinking about changing it if I don't find any cheap fix for this.
Did you solve your problem ?
It seems that you're not alone.
My LTO2 does exactly the same thing after a few months of very good service hours.
I've experienced a cooling problem in my server that raised the internal temperature to 55 °C (I'm french, sorry -;) - it might be the source of my problem. If so, these units are very fragile.
As I can find some second hand units on ebay at <$300 prices, I'm thinking about changing it if I don't find any cheap fix for this.
Did you solve your problem ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-28-2008 03:06 AM
12-28-2008 03:06 AM
Re: Surestore 215 (LTO 1) drive - low capacity
Hi Denis,
We had a support ticket open with HP who eventually came back to us with a quote for repairs to the drive (as we were out of warranty). I took this to mean that they'd either concluded it was a physical failure, or that they at least couldn't solve the problem without looking at the drive.
The rate was in the neighbourhood of the cost of a new storage solution anyway, so we shelved the drive (and all the new media we'd purchased for it...) and installed a RAID-5 NAS at the other end of the building to back up to.
I'd open a support ticket with HP if you're still in warranty, otherwise look for a replacement.
We had a support ticket open with HP who eventually came back to us with a quote for repairs to the drive (as we were out of warranty). I took this to mean that they'd either concluded it was a physical failure, or that they at least couldn't solve the problem without looking at the drive.
The rate was in the neighbourhood of the cost of a new storage solution anyway, so we shelved the drive (and all the new media we'd purchased for it...) and installed a RAID-5 NAS at the other end of the building to back up to.
I'd open a support ticket with HP if you're still in warranty, otherwise look for a replacement.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP