- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- StoreVirtual Storage
- >
- Re: Direct attached p4300
-
- Forums
-
- Advancing Life & Work
- Advantage EX
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- HPE Ezmeral: Uncut
- OEM Solutions
- Servers & Systems: The Right Compute
- Tech Insights
- The Cloud Experience Everywhere
- HPE Blog, Austria, Germany & Switzerland
- Blog HPE, France
- HPE Blog, Italy
- HPE Blog, Japan
- HPE Blog, Middle East
- HPE Blog, Latin America
- HPE Blog, Russia
- HPE Blog, Saudi Arabia
- HPE Blog, South Africa
- HPE Blog, UK & Ireland
-
Blogs
- Advancing Life & Work
- Advantage EX
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- HPE Blog, Latin America
- HPE Blog, Middle East
- HPE Blog, Saudi Arabia
- HPE Blog, South Africa
- HPE Blog, UK & Ireland
- HPE Ezmeral: Uncut
- OEM Solutions
- Servers & Systems: The Right Compute
- Tech Insights
- The Cloud Experience Everywhere
-
Information
- Community
- Welcome
- Getting Started
- FAQ
- Ranking Overview
- Rules of Participation
- Tips and Tricks
- Resources
- Announcements
- Email us
- Feedback
- Information Libraries
- Integrated Systems
- Networking
- Servers
- Storage
- Other HPE Sites
- Support Center
- Aruba Airheads Community
- Enterprise.nxt
- HPE Dev Community
- Cloud28+ Community
- Marketplace
-
Forums
-
Blogs
-
Information
-
English
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2013 03:20 AM
03-20-2013 03:20 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2013 03:33 AM
03-20-2013 03:33 AM
Solutionthe nodes wouldn't be able to see each other, therefore you would have two single nodes, each in its own management group. And that would be only the start of your problems, as Windows doesn't exactly like to have several NICs in the same subnet. So a server would probably only be able to see one of the nodes when they are in the same subnet. So you'd need different subnets for the connections and would have none of the lefthand features available. Sounds like a great plan to waste a lot of money...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2013 03:58 AM
03-20-2013 03:58 AM
Re: Direct attached p4300
Thanks a lot for your replay, Dirk.
I have another ports on my nodes (1Gb), which I can use for communication between nodes
and with CMC
I can configure different subnets on different ports, so Windows hosts will see both nodes
and won't be confused
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2013 11:15 AM
03-20-2013 11:15 AM
Re: Direct attached p4300
its a SAN. You need a switch. If they want a DAS unit they should have gotten a SAS chassis. If they have spare ports on a switch that can handle VLANs, put it on that, if not, get a moderately cheap switch and use it for your SAN. I don't think its even possible to do what you are asking and it literally imits you (assuming its even possible) to two nodes and two servers max. If that is all they want, then they shoudl sell the P4000 stuff and buy a DAS tray.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2013 04:09 AM
03-21-2013 04:09 AM
Re: Direct attached p4300
Thanks a lot, oikjn.
I'll try to discuss this with customer.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise International
- Communities
- HPE Blogs and Forum
© Copyright 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP