- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- StoreVirtual Storage
- >
- P4500, SRM and FOM
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-07-2014 12:57 AM - last edited on 10-07-2014 10:05 PM by Lisa198503
10-07-2014 12:57 AM - last edited on 10-07-2014 10:05 PM by Lisa198503
Hi All
Hopefully this is posted on the right board.
Just want to make sure I'm not going nuts - failover manager is not useful for a single site cluster that replicates to a second site and uses SRM/SRA to manage the DR ... right? In fact it's no use on a single site at all as far as I know?
As I see it, the FOM is only useful for stretched or split site clusters where a quorum would be needed in the event of loss of site - is this the correct view?
Thanks for any advice.
P.S. This thread has been moved from Storage Area Networks (SAN) (Enterprise) to HP StoreVirtual Storage / LeftHand. -HP Forum Moderator
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-08-2014 10:45 AM
10-08-2014 10:45 AM
Solutionits useful for a two-node management group on a single site. For three+ nodes you don't need one, but I run one for my four node single site management group as HP seems to think that five managers is idea.
You really want to avoid using a virtual manager if at all possible as it does not allow for true automatic failover when the node that is hosting the virtual manager goes down and quorum is lost.