- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Re: 2610, STP and Aggregation switch
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-15-2008 08:38 AM
тАО04-15-2008 08:38 AM
Re: 2610, STP and Aggregation switch
you can take 3 switch and to make test my config
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-15-2008 09:00 AM
тАО04-15-2008 09:00 AM
Re: 2610, STP and Aggregation switch
Is possibile?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-15-2008 10:26 AM
тАО04-15-2008 10:26 AM
Re: 2610, STP and Aggregation switch
however two 2810 switch above router 1 connections you make enable stp protocol router and switchs some line blok stp
you omit enable stp, loop occur on network.
this loop occur not concarned truk config and you omit enable stp all producer switch ,router to face loop if you enable stp block some link block.
I think you network topology incorrect
because you make select products for your topology faulty.
2810 only L2 switch not to be on routing protocol ,all port 10/100/1000 and jumbo freme supported this switch edge switch
2610 only 2 or 4 port (2extension minigbic,2copper) port 1000Mbps other all ports 10/100 Mbps this switch edge switch
include static routing and acl.
as for me... frist you do think your network goals and you want what type redundancy network.
please you say me your network goal ,I say true product and topology.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-15-2008 11:34 AM
тАО04-15-2008 11:34 AM
Re: 2610, STP and Aggregation switch
Then, I will connect port 23 (gigabit) of one 2610 to port 1 (gigabit) on the first 2810.
Then I'll connect port 24 (gigabit) of the second 2610 to port 1 (giga) of the another 2810.
On 2610 I'll make a trunk between port 23 and 24 so there aren't loops.
What's wrong with this?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-15-2008 02:49 PM
тАО04-15-2008 02:49 PM
Re: 2610, STP and Aggregation switch
you send me your network layout anyway not occur loop between 2810 and 2610
and please see my above config sh stp print
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
this switch you same 2610
Rapid Spanning Tree (RSTP) Information
STP Enabled : Yes
Force Version : RSTP-operation
Switch Priority : 32768 Hello Time : 2
Max Age : 20 Forward Delay : 15
Topology Change Count : 41
Time Since Last Change : 114 secs
Root MAC Address : 0016b9-b79840
Root Path Cost : 0
Root Port : This switch is root
Root Priority : 32768
Root Guard Ports :
TCN Guard Ports :
Protected Ports :
Filtered Ports :
Port Type Cost Priority State | Designated Bridge
-- MORE --, next page: Space, next line: Enter, quit: Control-C ----- --------- --------- -------- ---------- + -----------------
1 10/100TX 200000 128 Forwarding | 0016b9-b79840
2 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
3 10/100TX 200000 128 Forwarding | 0016b9-b79840
4 10/100TX 200000 128 Forwarding | 0016b9-b79840
5 10/100TX 200000 128 Forwarding | 0016b9-b79840
6 10/100TX 200000 128 Forwarding | 0016b9-b79840
7 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
8 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
9 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
10 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
11 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
12 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
13 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
14 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
15 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
16 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
17 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
18 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
21 10/100TX 200000 128 Forwarding | 0016b9-b79840
22 10/100TX 200000 128 Forwarding | 0016b9-b79840
23 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
24 10/100TX 200000 128 Forwarding | 0016b9-b79840
25 100/1000T 200000 128 Forwarding | 0016b9-b79840
26 100/1000T 20000 128 Disabled |
Trk1 200000 64 Forwarding | 0016b9-b79840 (no loop no block forwar stp )
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
this switch same your frist 2810
Rapid Spanning Tree (RSTP) Information
STP Enabled : Yes
Force Version : RSTP-operation
Switch Priority : 32768 Hello Time : 2
Max Age : 20 Forward Delay : 15
Topology Change Count : 25
Time Since Last Change : 2 mins
Root MAC Address : 0016b9-b79840
Root Path Cost : 220000
Root Port : 25
Root Priority : 32768
Protected Ports :
Filtered Ports :
Port Type Cost Priority State | Designated Bridge
----- --------- --------- -------- ---------- + -----------------
1 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
-- MORE --, next page: Space, next line: Enter, quit: Control-C 2 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
3 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
4 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
5 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
6 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
7 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
8 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
9 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
11 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
12 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
13 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
14 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
15 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
16 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
17 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
18 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
19 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
20 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
21 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
22 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
23 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
24 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
25 100/1000T 20000 128 Forwarding | 001b3f-e00cc0
- 26 100/1000T 20000 128 Disabled |
Trk1 200000 64 Forwarding | 001c2e-07d280 (no stp block trk 1 forward state)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
this switch same your second 2810 switch
Rapid Spanning Tree (RSTP) Information
STP Enabled : Yes
Force Version : RSTP-operation
Switch Priority : 32768 Hello Time : 2
Max Age : 20 Forward Delay : 15
Topology Change Count : 21
Time Since Last Change : 3 mins
Root MAC Address : 0016b9-b79840
Root Path Cost : 200000
Root Port : Trk1
Root Priority : 32768
Protected Ports :
Filtered Ports :
Port Type Cost Priority State | Designated Bridge
----- --------- --------- -------- ---------- + -----------------
1 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
-- MORE --, next page: Space, next line: Enter, quit: Control-C 2 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
3 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
4 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
5 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
6 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
7 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
8 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
9 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
11 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
12 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
13 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
14 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
15 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
16 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
17 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
18 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
19 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
20 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
21 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
22 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
23 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
24 10/100TX 200000 128 Disabled |
25 100/1000T 20000 128 Forwarding | 001b3f-e00cc0
--26 100/1000T 20000 128 Disabled |
Trk1 200000 64 Forwarding | 0016b9-b79840 (no stp block trunk 1 port state forward)
ProCurve Switch 2626(config)#
please check my config on network
you see not occur loops and you carefully look 2610 int 23 and 24 agregate port new interface on 2610 trk1 and speed 2Gbps
my propose
ProCurve different redundancy architecture
for example hp mesh protocol include 3400,3500,5300,5400 etc.product familiy
this protocol supply full L2 active very strong redundancy
please read my site this protocol information
http://cenksasmaztin.tr.gg/Hp-mesh-.htm
good luck..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-15-2008 08:57 PM
тАО04-15-2008 08:57 PM
Re: 2610, STP and Aggregation switch
3 Comments i want to add:
1- Concerning the last Topology file you've attached, the link between 2610 and both 2810 are called UPLINKS, and only Cisco called it Trunk (carry all the Vlans).
2- I'm with Matt, if you want to achieve Loop Free Topology + Load Balancing + Redundancy, then you must use MSTP with at least 2 Instances.
3- With such Topology, you have a single point of failure on the 2610, because if this 2610 failed then all the servers will be down.
Since you have a 2610 in each RACK, then i suggest you SOMEHOW manage to get from each server 2 links, one to first 2610, and the other one to the 2610 in the other rack.
Good Luck !!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-15-2008 09:42 PM
тАО04-15-2008 09:42 PM
Re: 2610, STP and Aggregation switch
Thanks, Merci , Grazie , Dank , ├г ├г ├г ├г ┬и├г ,
├ж ├и┬░┬в , Gracias , Agradecimentos , ├Р┬▒├Р┬╗├Р┬░├Р┬│├Р┬╛├Р┬┤├Р┬░├С ├С , ├Ш┬┤├Щ ├Ш┬▒├Ш┬з .............................................
Then assign points to ALL who spent TIME on your post(s) to find a solution or help.
Good Luck !!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-16-2008 12:04 AM
тАО04-16-2008 12:04 AM
Re: 2610, STP and Aggregation switch
I can't change the 2610 switches because already bought.
Servers wille be connected via an active/passive link (two ethernet per server)
I like to connect the two gigabit ports on 2610 to one port of each 2810 switch.
I can do it by simply enable rstp. I'll have redundancy but i'll not have bandwidth aggregation.
One solution is to put two minigbic cat5 on each 2610, then trunk port 23-24 and connect it to one 2810, and trunk port 25-26 and connect it to the other 2810.
I'll have bandwidth aggregation e redundancy.
Actually I prefer to skip buy minigbic.
Is possibile to trunk port 23 and 24 and splitting it on the 2810?
Teorically is possibile:
on 2610 I'll make a trunk between port 23 and 24 and on the 2810 i'll make a trunk with port 1.
It should go in degraded mode on the 2810 but in full mode on 2610....
Any idea?
I've seen switch meshing, but I need to change all switches (also the 2610) and actually I can't.
More over, switches with meshing capability are out of our budget.
At the moment, cheaper switch is 4200 family but chassis only is more expensive than two 2610 and I need to buy also some modules to put inside.
So:
- or I use switch meshing (4200 for distribution, 3500 for core/aggregation) but we are out of budget
- or I put two minigbic inside each 2610 but will go out of budget very soon if we do so.
- or I'll find the way to aggregate the two gigabit port on 2610 to do redundancy and 2gbit link.
The last way is the only one that will be accepted by our boss.
:)
Sorry for my english.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-16-2008 05:35 AM
тАО04-16-2008 05:35 AM
Solution- I believe both 2610 and 2810 don't support Switch Meshing feature.
- With the Topology you've attached, you get 99 marks (one mark missing).
- The last mark is to create a Trunk of 2 Links between the 2810s, and now you get 100 marks :)
- Configuration wise, use MSTP not RSTP.
Attached is my suggested drawings (according to the information in this post).
Good Luck !!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-16-2008 07:03 AM
тАО04-16-2008 07:03 AM
Re: 2610, STP and Aggregation switch
I don't understand why i need to trunk 2 ports between 2810s...
If I put port 23 on 2610 on VLAN1 and port 24 on 2610 on VLAN2, I can do MSTP having High Availability and Load Balancing (bandwidth aggregation) ?
I'm totally new to MSTP, can you post me an example configuration that will do what I like to do (HA and aggregation)?
Using MSTP is enough or I must use also rSTP?