- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- 4108 Packet Drops
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1753876
Members
7784
Online
108809
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-01-2004 06:48 PM
12-01-2004 06:48 PM
Hello,
We've a 4108 GL full of Git SX.
None of the Ports are use above 50% of Bandwith. So the Backplane connection of 2GB is not overloaded. In additional there are 2 high loaded Trunks (2GB 50%).
on some Ports (none of the Trunks) We've dropped Packets.
Firmware ist up to date.
I've replaced some of these Transceivers. No change.
I wonder that not all Ports have this Problem. It this the same application with same load.
Normally I would say that this is not really a Problem. The drops are around 1 per 1000 packets. But I guess, there is a perfomance problem in this applikation and so i have to be sure it is not caused by this switch.
any suggestions?
So long
Ralf
We've a 4108 GL full of Git SX.
None of the Ports are use above 50% of Bandwith. So the Backplane connection of 2GB is not overloaded. In additional there are 2 high loaded Trunks (2GB 50%).
on some Ports (none of the Trunks) We've dropped Packets.
Firmware ist up to date.
I've replaced some of these Transceivers. No change.
I wonder that not all Ports have this Problem. It this the same application with same load.
Normally I would say that this is not really a Problem. The drops are around 1 per 1000 packets. But I guess, there is a perfomance problem in this applikation and so i have to be sure it is not caused by this switch.
any suggestions?
So long
Ralf
Solved! Go to Solution.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-03-2004 07:54 AM
12-03-2004 07:54 AM
Solution
Ralf,
the internal design of the switch is the problem. Some of the ports are connected to the same link to the backplane, hence can be on the limit even if you only run 50% on each. I dont have the internal wiring of the modules handy right now, but i will find it if you need those. As example, port 1 uses connection 1 port 2 connection 2 port 3 connection 1 port 4 connection 1 port 5 connection 2 and port six connection 1 - that would mean they are indeed not evenly spread as you might expect. That is where your problem might is. The manual used to have the internal wiring but i'm not sure if it still does. As far as trunking goes, that is where things get really messed up, you almost want to use both backplane interconnects but as far as I remember the overhead in getting this working right is killing performance. One packet out of 1000 should not slow your app down, however that is indeed a poor way to measure that since you need to know what the latency for the data is (how long from a to b). Not sure if procurve publishes those numbers. (if not you know why...)
Hope that helps and points are apprechiated.
GG
the internal design of the switch is the problem. Some of the ports are connected to the same link to the backplane, hence can be on the limit even if you only run 50% on each. I dont have the internal wiring of the modules handy right now, but i will find it if you need those. As example, port 1 uses connection 1 port 2 connection 2 port 3 connection 1 port 4 connection 1 port 5 connection 2 and port six connection 1 - that would mean they are indeed not evenly spread as you might expect. That is where your problem might is. The manual used to have the internal wiring but i'm not sure if it still does. As far as trunking goes, that is where things get really messed up, you almost want to use both backplane interconnects but as far as I remember the overhead in getting this working right is killing performance. One packet out of 1000 should not slow your app down, however that is indeed a poor way to measure that since you need to know what the latency for the data is (how long from a to b). Not sure if procurve publishes those numbers. (if not you know why...)
Hope that helps and points are apprechiated.
GG
most time the day i have to mask my contempt for the a-holes in charge......
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP