- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- 5372XL Routing
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2003 08:12 AM
тАО09-09-2003 08:12 AM
5372XL Routing
I would like to route between subnetts without
building vlans. Is that possible with the 5372XL?
Can I use secondary addresses?
Regards
Elmer Zaglauer
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2003 08:42 AM
тАО09-09-2003 08:42 AM
Re: 5372XL Routing
You can, however, leave all ports as untagged so that other devices won't know about 5300XL's VLAN settings.
Example: you want to route between A1 (192.168.100.1/24) and A2 (192.168.200.1/24):
vlan 100 (for example)
ip address 192.168.100.1/24
untagged a1
vlan 200
ip address 192.168.200.1/24
untagged a2
ip routing
Now the switch knows how to route between 192.168.100.0/24 and 192.168.200.0/24 networks, which are connected to A1 and A2, respectively. No other device will know about the VLAN numbers, and no other 802.1Q-capable devices are needed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-10-2003 12:23 AM
тАО09-10-2003 12:23 AM
Re: 5372XL Routing
but that is not what I want to do.
I have 3 networks for example
10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0
10.1.3.0 255.255.255.0
The Endstations are mixed all over the network.
At the moment there is a CISCO Router as Default
Gateway 10.1.1.1 ans with secondary addresses
10.1.2.1 and 10.1.3.1
The 5372XL should become the knew Default Gateway
if he can do the same.
Only the default VLAN 10.1.1.1 and secondary
adresses 10.1.2.1 and 10.1.3.1
Elmer
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2003 01:05 PM
тАО11-04-2003 01:05 PM
Re: 5372XL Routing
vlan
Some stipulations for using this functionality (check the entire section on Configuring IP Addressing - section 7):
1. You MUST define static IP addresses on the switch to define secondary IP addresses
2. You can only assign 7 secondary IP addresses.
3. There may be DHCP issues for your clients where a client ends up in a subnet they aren't supposed to because one DHCP server answered before another. If you are using a separate switch for each subnet with a DHCP server on each switch, you would never run into this problem given the config you posted. It's a different ballgame if you want to consolidate to a single switch.
I do agree with Markku that you should use VLANs, as I would imagine that there was some reason to keep those subnets routed instead of on one large subnet like 10.1.0.0/16 (255.255.0.0). Or you could use something like:
10.1.0.0/22 (255.255.253.0)
The above would more than cover the entire IP range you listed in a single subnet with no need for a router to communicate between them.
Using the large subnet would elimate the need for the router entirely, but signifcantly increase broadcast traffic, which is probably the reason for the subnetting in the first place. The switch can be setup for DHCP relay so you only have to maintain a single DHCP server.
Without using VLANs you won't actually reduce this traffic to the clients. In your current setup, your router is most likely completely bogged down with routing packets and looking at broadcast traffic from 3 subnets, which is probably why you're contemplating getting a routing switch. You can still keep your clients spread out as they are, but you'll need to configure the switch (and where the clients plug in) so that those clients end up on their respective VLANs.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2003 01:07 PM
тАО11-04-2003 01:07 PM
Re: 5372XL Routing
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2003 03:33 PM
тАО11-04-2003 03:33 PM
Re: 5372XL Routing
Yes, it is possible to do what you want.
1) you need to create 3 VLANS and assign a mgmt IP addr to each of these VLANs. e.g. 10.1.1.1 to VLAN-1, 10.1.2.1 to VLAN-2, 10.1.3.1 to VLAN-3.
2) assign ports to each of these VLANs
3) connect broadcast domain 1 (10.1.1.0/24) to a VLAN-1 port. Hosts in this broadcast domain will point to 10.1.1.1 as their default gateway.
4) connect broadcast domain 2 (10.1.2.0/24) to a VLAN-2 port. Hosts in this broadcast domain will point to 10.1.2.1 as their default gateway.
5) connect broadcast domain 3 (10.1.3.0/24) to a VLAN-3 port. Hosts in this broadcast domain will point to 10.1.3.1 as their default gateway.
6) turn layer 3 routing on using your telnet/ssh logon and the menu system
7) add static routes or turn appropriate interior routing protocol(s) on using CLI. e.g. ospf, rip1, rip2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2003 08:38 PM
тАО11-04-2003 08:38 PM
Re: 5372XL Routing
thanks for all your answers. In the meantime I
had the possibility to test the scenario and
it worked. I configuered three adresses for
vlan 1.
There is only one mistake in the documentation
and also in the cli help.
If you configure the second IP Address with
the extension
You have to do it without the
extension.
Regards
Elmer