- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- 5406zl ACL seems backwards to me.... Can some expl...
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1752252
Members
5058
Online
108785
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-03-2008 10:09 AM
тАО03-03-2008 10:09 AM
5406zl ACL seems backwards to me.... Can some explain it to me?
I want to use ACLs to control access to a management VLAN. The subnets that I want to give access to management VLAN are 10.1.25.0/24 and 10.2.25.0/24. I've created an access-list called SysMgmt and applied to the management VLAN (VLAN 1060). On VLAN 1060 I've applied the SysMGMT ACL to inbound traffic.
Here is my working example:
ip access-list extended "SysMgmt"
10 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 10.1.25.0 0.0.0.255
20 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 10.2.25.0 0.0.0.255
exit
vlan 1060
name "1060-NetMGMT"
ip helper-address 10.1.20.3
ip address 10.2.60.1 255.255.255.0
tagged A3-A6,Trk1
ip access-group "SysMgmt" in
exit
---
The ACL syntax above seems backwards to me. Isn't it:
10 permit ip
Here is my working example:
ip access-list extended "SysMgmt"
10 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 10.1.25.0 0.0.0.255
20 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 10.2.25.0 0.0.0.255
exit
vlan 1060
name "1060-NetMGMT"
ip helper-address 10.1.20.3
ip address 10.2.60.1 255.255.255.0
tagged A3-A6,Trk1
ip access-group "SysMgmt" in
exit
---
The ACL syntax above seems backwards to me. Isn't it:
10 permit ip
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-04-2008 12:49 PM
тАО03-04-2008 12:49 PM
Re: 5406zl ACL seems backwards to me.... Can some explain it to me?
With this ACL:
10 permit ip 10.1.25.0 0.0.0.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
20 permit ip 10.2.25.0 0.0.0.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
What you actually need to do is apply it outbound on VLAN 1060.
OR
Apply it inbound on the source VLAN's of 10.1.25.0/24 and 10.2.25.0/24.
Try to think of 'in' as coming in physically on that VLAN. 'out' on the other hand is coming from a different VLAN on the switch. Once you have your head around that everything will hopefully make sense.
10 permit ip 10.1.25.0 0.0.0.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
20 permit ip 10.2.25.0 0.0.0.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
What you actually need to do is apply it outbound on VLAN 1060.
OR
Apply it inbound on the source VLAN's of 10.1.25.0/24 and 10.2.25.0/24.
Try to think of 'in' as coming in physically on that VLAN. 'out' on the other hand is coming from a different VLAN on the switch. Once you have your head around that everything will hopefully make sense.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-04-2008 01:55 PM
тАО03-04-2008 01:55 PM
Re: 5406zl ACL seems backwards to me.... Can some explain it to me?
I should clarify that applying it inbound on those other VLANs would be pretty much useless given that the destination address is to any.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP