Skip to ContentSkip to Footer
Start of content
- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- 9300, Cisco, QoS, and redundancy...
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
-
-
Categories
- Topics
- Hybrid IT with Cloud
- Mobile & IoT
- IT for Data & Analytics
- Transformation
- Strategy and Technology
- Products
- Cloud
- Integrated Systems
- Networking
- Servers and Operating Systems
- Services
- Storage
- Company
- Events
- Partner Solutions and Certifications
- Welcome
- Welcome
- Announcements
- Tips and Tricks
- Feedback
-
Blogs
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- Behind the scenes @ Labs
- Converged Data Center Infrastructure
- Digital Transformation
- Grounded in the Cloud
- HPE Careers
- HPE Storage Tech Insiders
- Infrastructure Insights
- Inspiring Progress
- Internet of Things (IoT)
- My Learning Certification
- Networking
- OEM Solutions
- Servers: The Right Compute
- Telecom IQ
- Transforming IT
-
Quick Links
- Community
- Getting Started
- FAQ
- Ranking Overview
- Rules of Participation
- Contact
- Email us
- Tell us what you think
- Information Libraries
- Integrated Systems
- Networking
- Servers
- Storage
- Other HPE Sites
- Support Center
- Enterprise.nxt
- Marketplace
- Aruba Airheads Community
-
Categories
-
Forums
-
Blogs
-
InformationEnglish
9300, Cisco, QoS, and redundancy...
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-19-2004 03:04 AM
10-19-2004 03:04 AM
9300, Cisco, QoS, and redundancy...
9300, Cisco, QoS, and redundancy...
I am using the 9315m. I am implementing VoIP over FR with a Cisco 3640 (RIP routes are going to be used). I am also using a PIX for Internet, but will use it for a redundant link for FR failover (static routes in 9315m with modified administrative distance). Has anyone worked out configs for such a scenario?
1 REPLY
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-19-2004 08:14 PM
10-19-2004 08:14 PM
Re: 9300, Cisco, QoS, and redundancy...
Re: 9300, Cisco, QoS, and redundancy...
Jody,
I'm scared there will be a proximity problem for backup static routes : In some cases the 9315 will continue to use the route by the 3640 for a long time (ex: if only the FR link is down on the 3640, the 9315 can only know if the ethernet port of the 3640 -the next hop- is up).
Note that it's not an HP problem, most of other manufacterer's devices work the same way.
You will get the same problem in all server rooms for return path routes.
You could use RIP, but for me (And I think a lot of people), it is better to use ospf, in and between your server rooms.
For QoS, it should be OK on the HP 93xx, and on the Cisco 3640 (Check the IOS). For the PIX I can't help you.
Arnaud
I'm scared there will be a proximity problem for backup static routes : In some cases the 9315 will continue to use the route by the 3640 for a long time (ex: if only the FR link is down on the 3640, the 9315 can only know if the ethernet port of the 3640 -the next hop- is up).
Note that it's not an HP problem, most of other manufacterer's devices work the same way.
You will get the same problem in all server rooms for return path routes.
You could use RIP, but for me (And I think a lot of people), it is better to use ospf, in and between your server rooms.
For QoS, it should be OK on the HP 93xx, and on the Cisco 3640 (Check the IOS). For the PIX I can't help you.
Arnaud
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
End of content
United States
Hewlett Packard Enterprise International
Communities
- Communities
- HPE Blogs and Forum
© Copyright 2018 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP