- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Re: Can you trust PCM+2.3 ?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-22-2008 01:31 AM
тАО04-22-2008 01:31 AM
Can you trust PCM+2.3 ?
With regular intervals, certain areas of my network are powerless due to scheduled maintenance of the power grid. I don't use UPS, but the network is RSTP'd to cope with the situation, and it does. PCM+2.3 does not see this, however, and happily reports traffic to and from the dead switches in the subnet map, although the ports to and from the dead area are reported inactive and the switches in the area are inaccessible.
The network map does not reflect the use of the normally blocked RSTP path. It is still reported as an STP blocked link.
Adding the bug in the device status history panel mentioned in an other post, I consider PCM+2.3 the worst version so far, and I don't trust it at all.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-22-2008 02:07 AM
тАО04-22-2008 02:07 AM
Re: Can you trust PCM+2.3 ?
-I have a couple of questions that could give a tiny tip of help.
-For how long this power disconnecting will last?
-How big is your network? How many Active devices you have in the PCM+?
-Have you try to Reduce the Scan Interval in the Network discovery options ?
-Have you tried to Rediscover one of the Switches that you are sure its dead due to the power ?
Good Luck !!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-22-2008 02:52 AM
тАО04-22-2008 02:52 AM
Re: Can you trust PCM+2.3 ?
The power is off for a period of 4-8 hours.
I have 43 active devices in the network.
The scan interval was set to 1 day. I have reduced it to 1 hour initially and I'll see what happens and fine tune later.
I havent tried to rediscover the switch as it's dead for sure. The disconnection is due to maintenance of the local high voltage grid (10kV), which is simply shut down, so anything connected to this is off by definition.
Perhaps I just expected PCM to react more or less instantaneously to a change in topology.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-22-2008 02:59 PM
тАО04-22-2008 02:59 PM
Re: Can you trust PCM+2.3 ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-22-2008 10:51 PM
тАО04-22-2008 10:51 PM
Re: Can you trust PCM+2.3 ?
Not all switches are fully updated, however. I'm evaluating I.10.43 on two 2824 switches before I roll it out network-wide.