- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Re: Cisco 3750 equivalent
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-17-2007 01:36 AM
тАО04-17-2007 01:36 AM
Cisco 3750 equivalent
Regards,
Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-17-2007 02:24 AM
тАО04-17-2007 02:24 AM
Re: Cisco 3750 equivalent
I wonder why you need a NAT on an Edge switch.
NAT usually used on a Router or a Firewall, not even on a Routing switch.
So if you can explain an Idea behind the use of NAT so we can find a solution for it.
Good Luck !!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-17-2007 03:25 AM
тАО04-17-2007 03:25 AM
Re: Cisco 3750 equivalent
servera at sitea 10.10.10.5 needs to get to serverb at siteb 10.10.10.2. The idea would be create a stub network 172.20.20.0/24 and it would happen like this:
10.10.10.10.5 --> 172.20.20.2 NATed to 10.10.10.2.
Currently we are doing this by using binat with OpenBSD but its getting really hard to manage plus with the overhead, we think it would be simpler to use some sort of appliance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-17-2007 04:22 AM
тАО04-17-2007 04:22 AM
Re: Cisco 3750 equivalent
Any thoughts on bundling the 3500 with a 7102dl router? It's two devices but might do the trick.
I think the problem is getting an ASIC device with 48 ethernet ports and a routing brain - you may need two devices. Or a switch that can NAT which I have not seen via ProCurve's lineup.
Thanks,
Rob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-17-2007 04:34 AM
тАО04-17-2007 04:34 AM
Re: Cisco 3750 equivalent
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-17-2007 04:58 AM
тАО04-17-2007 04:58 AM
Re: Cisco 3750 equivalent
In ProCurve your only choice is the Secure Router but with 100M.
Also, i don't think the cisco 3750 is capable of doing NAT:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/166.html#topic1
Good Luck !!!