Switches, Hubs, and Modems
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Cisco Trunking(aka HP Tagging) between 2960G and Procurve 1700

Sandeep Rai
Occasional Visitor

Cisco Trunking(aka HP Tagging) between 2960G and Procurve 1700

Dear Everybody,

All I wish is that the two VLANs - 110 and 113 which are available on my Cisco 2960G to be available on my HP 1700. I could get my Management VLAN which is 110 however, my tagging port (HP) aka Trunk Port(Cisco) could not carry the other VLANs. I am able to ping within my VLANs not one from VLAN to other even though I configure the devices to have the default gateway of the router.

I paste the screen shot of the
3 REPLIES
ZubairS
Occasional Advisor

Re: Cisco Trunking(aka HP Tagging) between 2960G and Procurve 1700

Hi Sandeep.

Firstly are you trying to ping from the different subnet or the same subnet? If you pinging from different subnets you need a router or multilayer switch (L2/L3 support).

Also from the screenshot it does not look like your trunk link is enabled.

Please confirm and also ensure you using dot1q encapsulation between the switches on the trunk links.
Sandeep Rai
Occasional Visitor

Re: Cisco Trunking(aka HP Tagging) between 2960G and Procurve 1700

Hi There,

I am aware of the requirement of the L3, its just that the user interface of 1700s tossed me off. I managed to trunk them.

The trunk port on HP's need to be member of all vlans. It worked fine.

Thanks,
Sandeep
Sandeep Rai
Occasional Visitor

Re: Cisco Trunking(aka HP Tagging) between 2960G and Procurve 1700

See above.