- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Host route table sizes
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1753394
Members
7292
Online
108792
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-16-2009 04:50 AM
04-16-2009 04:50 AM
Host route table sizes
I wonder which is the most capable L3 routing switch in the Procurve series today?
I'm talking in a pure pps/Mbps performance perspective, but with a large number of different source/dest IP addresses (>10.000)?
Models of consideration are 3400cl, 3500yl, 5300, 5400.
I read somewhere that the 3400 uses a different routing model than for instance 3500, with a seperate host route table for directly connected hosts, and a best-prefix network route table for external hosts. Is that right?
If that's true, is the 3500 still superiour to a 3400 when routing alot of external IP adresses?
I'm talking in a pure pps/Mbps performance perspective, but with a large number of different source/dest IP addresses (>10.000)?
Models of consideration are 3400cl, 3500yl, 5300, 5400.
I read somewhere that the 3400 uses a different routing model than for instance 3500, with a seperate host route table for directly connected hosts, and a best-prefix network route table for external hosts. Is that right?
If that's true, is the 3500 still superiour to a 3400 when routing alot of external IP adresses?
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP