- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Iperf testing TCP outperforming UDP
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1752756
Members
4972
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-18-2010 09:18 PM
05-18-2010 09:18 PM
Iperf testing TCP outperforming UDP
HI All
I have MSM422 AP,s controlled by a MSM765zl controller. We were doing some tresting and noticed that TCP significantly outperformed UDP in our iperf results.
See Below
C:\Temp>iperf -c 192.168.20.253 -i 2
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.20.253, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[128] local 192.168.11.112 port 50267 connected with 192.168.20.253 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[128] 0.0- 2.0 sec 2.95 MBytes 12.4 Mbits/sec
[128] 2.0- 4.0 sec 3.00 MBytes 12.6 Mbits/sec
[128] 4.0- 6.0 sec 2.98 MBytes 12.5 Mbits/sec
[128] 6.0- 8.0 sec 2.39 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec
[128] 8.0-10.0 sec 2.00 MBytes 8.39 Mbits/sec
[128] 0.0-10.0 sec 13.3 MBytes 11.1 Mbits/sec
C:\Temp>iperf -c 192.168.20.253 -i 2 -u
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.20.253, UDP port 5001
Sending 1470 byte datagrams
UDP buffer size: 8.00 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[128] local 192.168.11.112 port 53959 connected with 192.168.20.253 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[128] 0.0- 2.0 sec 184 KBytes 753 Kbits/sec
[128] 2.0- 4.0 sec 184 KBytes 753 Kbits/sec
[128] 4.0- 6.0 sec 184 KBytes 753 Kbits/sec
[128] 6.0- 8.0 sec 184 KBytes 753 Kbits/sec
[128] 8.0-10.0 sec 185 KBytes 759 Kbits/sec
[128] 0.0-10.0 sec 922 KBytes 753 Kbits/sec
[128] WARNING: did not receive ack of last datagram after 10 tries.
The iperf server is the MSM765zl!
We thought this was a little strange as generally UDP is alot faster than TCP. We thought we may have a configuration issue somewhere.
Can anyone shed some light on these results?
I have MSM422 AP,s controlled by a MSM765zl controller. We were doing some tresting and noticed that TCP significantly outperformed UDP in our iperf results.
See Below
C:\Temp>iperf -c 192.168.20.253 -i 2
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.20.253, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[128] local 192.168.11.112 port 50267 connected with 192.168.20.253 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[128] 0.0- 2.0 sec 2.95 MBytes 12.4 Mbits/sec
[128] 2.0- 4.0 sec 3.00 MBytes 12.6 Mbits/sec
[128] 4.0- 6.0 sec 2.98 MBytes 12.5 Mbits/sec
[128] 6.0- 8.0 sec 2.39 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec
[128] 8.0-10.0 sec 2.00 MBytes 8.39 Mbits/sec
[128] 0.0-10.0 sec 13.3 MBytes 11.1 Mbits/sec
C:\Temp>iperf -c 192.168.20.253 -i 2 -u
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.20.253, UDP port 5001
Sending 1470 byte datagrams
UDP buffer size: 8.00 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[128] local 192.168.11.112 port 53959 connected with 192.168.20.253 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[128] 0.0- 2.0 sec 184 KBytes 753 Kbits/sec
[128] 2.0- 4.0 sec 184 KBytes 753 Kbits/sec
[128] 4.0- 6.0 sec 184 KBytes 753 Kbits/sec
[128] 6.0- 8.0 sec 184 KBytes 753 Kbits/sec
[128] 8.0-10.0 sec 185 KBytes 759 Kbits/sec
[128] 0.0-10.0 sec 922 KBytes 753 Kbits/sec
[128] WARNING: did not receive ack of last datagram after 10 tries.
The iperf server is the MSM765zl!
We thought this was a little strange as generally UDP is alot faster than TCP. We thought we may have a configuration issue somewhere.
Can anyone shed some light on these results?
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP