- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Load Balancing - 4160gl
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1752603
Members
5006
Online
108788
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-04-2007 12:25 AM
09-04-2007 12:25 AM
Load Balancing - 4160gl
I have a Procurve 4160gl which has 3 20 Gig-T gl modules installed. Is it possible to load balance across the mimi-GBIC Gig ports back to the server room?
Also this switch has been operating as the core switch, but is being reloacted so we will require a new HP core - cost is the key so what HP core should I be looking at?
Will require at least 24 Gig ports plus the fibre ports on the core.
Also this switch has been operating as the core switch, but is being reloacted so we will require a new HP core - cost is the key so what HP core should I be looking at?
Will require at least 24 Gig ports plus the fibre ports on the core.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-04-2007 06:27 PM
09-04-2007 06:27 PM
Re: Load Balancing - 4160gl
Hi
I believe the question is not clear but anyway
Load balancing can be done from the Servers by teaming the NICs, and can be done from the Switches side by making a trunk.
If you want to load balance between 2 switches then the 4100 is a bad choice, because its only supports RSTP spanning tree (layer2) and no layer3 redundancy.
But you can still create a trunk between the switches (with your fiber links) and the 4100 will distribute the traffic between the links of the same trunk group based on the source/destination address.
ftp://ftp.hp.com/pub/networking/software/Mgmt-Oct2005-59906023-Chap12.pdf
Good Luck !!!
I believe the question is not clear but anyway
Load balancing can be done from the Servers by teaming the NICs, and can be done from the Switches side by making a trunk.
If you want to load balance between 2 switches then the 4100 is a bad choice, because its only supports RSTP spanning tree (layer2) and no layer3 redundancy.
But you can still create a trunk between the switches (with your fiber links) and the 4100 will distribute the traffic between the links of the same trunk group based on the source/destination address.
ftp://ftp.hp.com/pub/networking/software/Mgmt-Oct2005-59906023-Chap12.pdf
Good Luck !!!
Science for Everyone
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP