Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1752345 Members
5475 Online
108787 Solutions
New Discussion юеВ

Re: Locating unauthorized, unmanaged hubs?

 
SOLVED
Go to solution
Preston Gallwas
Valued Contributor

Re: Locating unauthorized, unmanaged hubs?

27 locations are 1 IP subnet per location, (elementary schools and support sites)

6 of them have 2 IP subnets

Our high schools have between 4 and 8 subnets...


What do you mean by flat network? We're Hub-n-spoke here...

CISCO7000 --WAN -->Cisco2600-->HP ProCurve 2600 series stack

Is generally the setup for all sites
rick jones
Honored Contributor

Re: Locating unauthorized, unmanaged hubs?

one flat network would be one broadcast domain - i was guessing at that since you were asserting that enabling STP was a problem because of the number of sites involved. since STP would not cross routers, the only way the number of sites could be an issue were if you were trying to run a flat network.

so on the surface at least it would seem that enabling STP wouldn't be that big a deal?
there is no rest for the wicked yet the virtuous have no pillows
Preston Gallwas
Valued Contributor

Re: Locating unauthorized, unmanaged hubs?

No...unless it breaks some sort of novell login...again, I believe RSTP is the fix for this.

Is implementation pretty straightforward?

Are KNOWN uplink ports the only ones we need identify? is there a way to automatically identify?
rick jones
Honored Contributor

Re: Locating unauthorized, unmanaged hubs?

this may be getting a bit beyond the scope ofthe thread - ifyou want to switch to email - rick.jones2@hp.com.

anyway, i was meaning to ask about that STP broke novell login bit - do you have details of exactly how novell login cared about spanning tree?
there is no rest for the wicked yet the virtuous have no pillows
Preston Gallwas
Valued Contributor

Re: Locating unauthorized, unmanaged hubs?

E-mail sent, closing thread.