- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Meshing and XRRP
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1753854
Members
7966
Online
108808
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-15-2006 11:11 PM
тАО03-15-2006 11:11 PM
Meshing and XRRP
Hello,
we have some vlans (vlan 1..8) and a couple of servers (hp dl360) with 2 NICs. Each vlan is on another location.
Between the locations we have a limited amount of fibre lines.
The vlans are routed by the Default-GW 53xx (A) on the central site. For router redundancy we use a second 53xx (B) with xrrp configured on both sides (see attachment).
Til now, all servers in vlan 1 are directly connected with the 53xx on central site (A). But the 53xx (A) is a single point of failure for server access.
Now we want to use meshing to increase bandwidth and redundancy. Because meshing and routing isn't allowed on the same switch and the limitation of fibre lines between the central site and the location of switch D, we got two 34xx (E and F). There we want to split the NICs of each server and build a meshing domain including the 34xx switches C and D and the non-routing 53xx switches E and F.
So we need the connection a) for the mesh. But this seems to be a shortcut in the xrrp- functionality.
Is there any problem in this constellation and can you tell me best practices ?
Thanks for your help and let me know if I am unclear...
Best regards,
H-J
we have some vlans (vlan 1..8) and a couple of servers (hp dl360) with 2 NICs. Each vlan is on another location.
Between the locations we have a limited amount of fibre lines.
The vlans are routed by the Default-GW 53xx (A) on the central site. For router redundancy we use a second 53xx (B) with xrrp configured on both sides (see attachment).
Til now, all servers in vlan 1 are directly connected with the 53xx on central site (A). But the 53xx (A) is a single point of failure for server access.
Now we want to use meshing to increase bandwidth and redundancy. Because meshing and routing isn't allowed on the same switch and the limitation of fibre lines between the central site and the location of switch D, we got two 34xx (E and F). There we want to split the NICs of each server and build a meshing domain including the 34xx switches C and D and the non-routing 53xx switches E and F.
So we need the connection a) for the mesh. But this seems to be a shortcut in the xrrp- functionality.
Is there any problem in this constellation and can you tell me best practices ?
Thanks for your help and let me know if I am unclear...
Best regards,
H-J
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-16-2006 11:34 AM
тАО03-16-2006 11:34 AM
Re: Meshing and XRRP
Hi H-J,
If you're looking at using Meshing, I would actually use more links between the switches. In your diagram, I'd put another link between C & F, and D & E.
I'd also put a link directly between A & B.
Spanning-tree needs to be enabled on all the switches in the network. You need to set the spanning-tree priority higher on the core XRRP switches. (You probably already have this set).
Finally every switch needs to be configured with all of the VLANs in use on the network and have those VLANs tagged on the uplink ports back to the core. If you don't do this, in a failover situation you may notice that some VLANs no longer have full connectivity.
Hope this helps.
Matt
If you're looking at using Meshing, I would actually use more links between the switches. In your diagram, I'd put another link between C & F, and D & E.
I'd also put a link directly between A & B.
Spanning-tree needs to be enabled on all the switches in the network. You need to set the spanning-tree priority higher on the core XRRP switches. (You probably already have this set).
Finally every switch needs to be configured with all of the VLANs in use on the network and have those VLANs tagged on the uplink ports back to the core. If you don't do this, in a failover situation you may notice that some VLANs no longer have full connectivity.
Hope this helps.
Matt
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-21-2006 01:03 AM
тАО03-21-2006 01:03 AM
Re: Meshing and XRRP
Hi Matt,
thank you for your response.
That's O.K. with the links between C & F and D & E (see actualized attachment).
But I think, that the link between A & B will never go up. Because XRRP is configured at A & B, so B is permanently in Fail- Back- mode. And if one of these switches go down then the link between A & B goes down, too. Or is it wrong ?
Are there any problems to expect with load-balancing on the servers or is there a better constellation to increase bandwidth and redundancy ?
Best regards,
H-J
thank you for your response.
That's O.K. with the links between C & F and D & E (see actualized attachment).
But I think, that the link between A & B will never go up. Because XRRP is configured at A & B, so B is permanently in Fail- Back- mode. And if one of these switches go down then the link between A & B goes down, too. Or is it wrong ?
Are there any problems to expect with load-balancing on the servers or is there a better constellation to increase bandwidth and redundancy ?
Best regards,
H-J
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-21-2006 11:55 AM
тАО03-21-2006 11:55 AM
Re: Meshing and XRRP
Just looking closer at this, do you actually have spanning-tree enabled throughout at the moment? I'm guessing that you don't.
As soon as spanning-tree is enabled it's going to block a lot of the links that are currently in use which is why you would use the A-B link and enable all VLANs to be tagged on every link to every switch.
It really needs to be planned out on paper properly. I would recommend you get in touch with a ProCurve technical consultant in your region if possible.
For the server load balancing you would probably use Transmit Load Balancing.
As soon as spanning-tree is enabled it's going to block a lot of the links that are currently in use which is why you would use the A-B link and enable all VLANs to be tagged on every link to every switch.
It really needs to be planned out on paper properly. I would recommend you get in touch with a ProCurve technical consultant in your region if possible.
For the server load balancing you would probably use Transmit Load Balancing.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP