Skip to ContentSkip to Footer
Start of content
- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Procurve 1800
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
-
- Forums
-
- Advancing Life & Work
- Advantage EX
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- HPE Ezmeral: Uncut
- OEM Solutions
- Servers & Systems: The Right Compute
- Tech Insights
- The Cloud Experience Everywhere
- HPE Blog, Austria, Germany & Switzerland
- Blog HPE, France
- HPE Blog, Italy
- HPE Blog, Japan
- HPE Blog, Middle East
- HPE Blog, Russia
- HPE Blog, Saudi Arabia
- HPE Blog, South Africa
- HPE Blog, UK & Ireland
-
Blogs
- Advancing Life & Work
- Advantage EX
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- HPE Blog, Latin America
- HPE Blog, Middle East
- HPE Blog, Saudi Arabia
- HPE Blog, South Africa
- HPE Blog, UK & Ireland
- HPE Ezmeral: Uncut
- OEM Solutions
- Servers & Systems: The Right Compute
- Tech Insights
- The Cloud Experience Everywhere
-
Information
- Community
- Welcome
- Getting Started
- FAQ
- Ranking Overview
- Rules of Participation
- Tips and Tricks
- Resources
- Announcements
- Email us
- Feedback
- Information Libraries
- Integrated Systems
- Networking
- Servers
- Storage
- Other HPE Sites
- Support Center
- Aruba Airheads Community
- Enterprise.nxt
- HPE Dev Community
- Cloud28+ Community
- Marketplace
-
Forums
-
Blogs
-
Information
-
English
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2011 09:22 AM
05-27-2011 09:22 AM
Procurve 1800
Hi-
I have two procurve 1800's. I want to set them both up in the back of an office to support equipment on a different addressing scheme, along with equipment in our domain. It would be like this:
2 PC's with 192.168.5.x to Procurve 1 to Procurve 2, 3 hosts on the common ip scheme here (132.10.11.x)to Procurve 2, then Procurve 2 to wall drop which leads to the Core Switch (an H3C 5120). I'm testing this in our server closet before I deploy, and understand that I need to be able to ping the DGW of the core switch which is 132.10.11.1 from a device of the addressing scheme 192.168.5.x to verify the connection is configured correctly.
I created a vlan for this equipment. Port 46 of the core switch was configured properly to receive data from int 1 of procurve 2, which is in vlan 1. From procurve 2 I have int 24 going to procurve 1 int 21. On both of the procurves I have int 21 and 24 respectively in their own vlan (vlan 5). This vlan on the core sw is 192.168.5.1
I used a laptop to wire into a free int procurve one in vlan 1 (the default), and am able to ping the DGW of 132.10.11.1. But when
I configured it to have a static ip of 192.168.5.20 (an unused address, an example of the ip one of the PC's I will be pulling in with this addressing scheme) and wired into a free int in vlan 5, I am not able to ping either 192.168.5.1, or 132.10.11.1. As I understand it, I would need to be able to ping 132.10.11.1, the DGW of the core sw, to verify a host with that scheme will have connectivity. I'm not allowed to change the addressing scheme of the PC's I want to connect to the switch in vlan 5. All the ports in vlan 5 are tagging, except for port 1 of procurve 2 that goes to the 5120 core sw. The only ports that are vlan 5 and tagging are the ones mentioned. If it worked I would configure 1 more for the other PC, and leave the rest in vlan 1 for whatever else. Any advice??
I have two procurve 1800's. I want to set them both up in the back of an office to support equipment on a different addressing scheme, along with equipment in our domain. It would be like this:
2 PC's with 192.168.5.x to Procurve 1 to Procurve 2, 3 hosts on the common ip scheme here (132.10.11.x)to Procurve 2, then Procurve 2 to wall drop which leads to the Core Switch (an H3C 5120). I'm testing this in our server closet before I deploy, and understand that I need to be able to ping the DGW of the core switch which is 132.10.11.1 from a device of the addressing scheme 192.168.5.x to verify the connection is configured correctly.
I created a vlan for this equipment. Port 46 of the core switch was configured properly to receive data from int 1 of procurve 2, which is in vlan 1. From procurve 2 I have int 24 going to procurve 1 int 21. On both of the procurves I have int 21 and 24 respectively in their own vlan (vlan 5). This vlan on the core sw is 192.168.5.1
I used a laptop to wire into a free int procurve one in vlan 1 (the default), and am able to ping the DGW of 132.10.11.1. But when
I configured it to have a static ip of 192.168.5.20 (an unused address, an example of the ip one of the PC's I will be pulling in with this addressing scheme) and wired into a free int in vlan 5, I am not able to ping either 192.168.5.1, or 132.10.11.1. As I understand it, I would need to be able to ping 132.10.11.1, the DGW of the core sw, to verify a host with that scheme will have connectivity. I'm not allowed to change the addressing scheme of the PC's I want to connect to the switch in vlan 5. All the ports in vlan 5 are tagging, except for port 1 of procurve 2 that goes to the 5120 core sw. The only ports that are vlan 5 and tagging are the ones mentioned. If it worked I would configure 1 more for the other PC, and leave the rest in vlan 1 for whatever else. Any advice??
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
End of content
United States
Hewlett Packard Enterprise International
Communities
- Communities
- HPE Blogs and Forum
© Copyright 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP