- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Re: Procurve Redundancy
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1752793
Members
5870
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-13-2009 12:17 PM
тАО07-13-2009 12:17 PM
Procurve Redundancy
Hi
My current setup for redundancy is as follows:
I have 2 x 2810-24G and 3 x 2650-48 Procurve switches with spanning tree enabled.
The NICs on the ProLiant servers are teamed and one port from each card connected to one of the 2810s so each server is connected to both 2810s.
Each of the 1G uplink ports on the 2650s are connected to one of the 2810 so each 2650 is connected to both 2810s. PCs and printers are connected to the 2650s.
The 2810s are connected to each over with two trunked ports.
I have no issues other than the fact I'm running short of availble ports on the 2810s
Following the takeover of another company I have aquired 9 x 3400cl switches and would like to utilise them.
What would be the best configuration for redundancy? Should I replicate the above configuration or are there better features to use on these switches.
Any advise would be welcome.
Thanks
My current setup for redundancy is as follows:
I have 2 x 2810-24G and 3 x 2650-48 Procurve switches with spanning tree enabled.
The NICs on the ProLiant servers are teamed and one port from each card connected to one of the 2810s so each server is connected to both 2810s.
Each of the 1G uplink ports on the 2650s are connected to one of the 2810 so each 2650 is connected to both 2810s. PCs and printers are connected to the 2650s.
The 2810s are connected to each over with two trunked ports.
I have no issues other than the fact I'm running short of availble ports on the 2810s
Following the takeover of another company I have aquired 9 x 3400cl switches and would like to utilise them.
What would be the best configuration for redundancy? Should I replicate the above configuration or are there better features to use on these switches.
Any advise would be welcome.
Thanks
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-14-2009 11:17 PM
тАО07-14-2009 11:17 PM
Re: Procurve Redundancy
basically there seems no need to change the topology, if you only need to add more ports at the "access-layer".
but i think the 3400 has more capabilities than the 2810.
if so it could be an idea to replace your 2810's as "core-layer" by 3400's.
teaming across switches will be fault-tolerant only (not trunks) in both situations. so there's no improvement.
but i think the 3400 has more capabilities than the 2810.
if so it could be an idea to replace your 2810's as "core-layer" by 3400's.
teaming across switches will be fault-tolerant only (not trunks) in both situations. so there's no improvement.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-14-2009 11:32 PM
тАО07-14-2009 11:32 PM
Re: Procurve Redundancy
apart from that you may use "switch meshing"
to have all redundant links active instead of some blocked by spanning-tree.
see attachment for single image
or http://ftp.hp.com/pub/networking/software/6400-5300-4200-3400-AdvTrafficMgmt-Oct2006-59906051-Chap07.pdf
to have all redundant links active instead of some blocked by spanning-tree.
see attachment for single image
or http://ftp.hp.com/pub/networking/software/6400-5300-4200-3400-AdvTrafficMgmt-Oct2006-59906051-Chap07.pdf
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP