- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Procurve stacks and SNMP
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1753701
Members
4933
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-02-2008 08:22 AM
10-02-2008 08:22 AM
We use ONA http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1251160 for network administration. I've started setting up stacks with HP Procurve equipment and they didn't work with ONA as it is. I then started using snmpwalk to walk the whole device, then diff non-stack and stacks in order to identify the proper OIDs to use.
I've used Baystack stacks for a decade and when switches are stacked they all appear as a single big switch via SNMP queries. I get the impression that this isn't true for procurve switches; but that doesn't make sense because one would typically setup Procurve stack switches without IP address and without an IP one can't SNMP to them.
I've used Baystack stacks for a decade and when switches are stacked they all appear as a single big switch via SNMP queries. I get the impression that this isn't true for procurve switches; but that doesn't make sense because one would typically setup Procurve stack switches without IP address and without an IP one can't SNMP to them.
Solved! Go to Solution.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-02-2008 10:58 AM
10-02-2008 10:58 AM
Solution
Eric,
I have to admit I never looked into ProCurve "stacks" for the reasons already discussed here just some threads down. But in the implementation that probably was the prototype here (Cisco XL switch clusters), the implementation simply used a suffix to the SNMP community to address any non-master cluster member. IIRC something like
:public --> talks to master MIB
:public@2 --> talks to member 2 MIB
etc. I wouldn't be too surprised if HP did things the same way. There isn't much else of a subaddress you could use (unless you frell with the OIDs themselves, e.g. by prefixing them with some enterprise MIB parent encoding the method and member).
IIRC BayStacks use real stacking (the chassis achieve a unified single-hop switch identity), so getting a single MIB is just a side effect of the otherwise superior implementation. ProCurve "stacks" (like Cisco XL clusters) are just a management simplification hack that introduces an unnecessary management SPoF. IMO they are a marketing device (for feature checklists and a bad surprise for people expecting actual stacking).
HTH,
Andre.
I have to admit I never looked into ProCurve "stacks" for the reasons already discussed here just some threads down. But in the implementation that probably was the prototype here (Cisco XL switch clusters), the implementation simply used a suffix to the SNMP community to address any non-master cluster member. IIRC something like
etc. I wouldn't be too surprised if HP did things the same way. There isn't much else of a subaddress you could use (unless you frell with the OIDs themselves, e.g. by prefixing them with some enterprise MIB parent encoding the method and member).
IIRC BayStacks use real stacking (the chassis achieve a unified single-hop switch identity), so getting a single MIB is just a side effect of the otherwise superior implementation. ProCurve "stacks" (like Cisco XL clusters) are just a management simplification hack that introduces an unnecessary management SPoF. IMO they are a marketing device (for feature checklists and a bad surprise for people expecting actual stacking).
HTH,
Andre.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP