- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Re: Redundancy strategy for 2848's
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1753679
Members
5662
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-24-2009 04:52 PM
тАО04-24-2009 04:52 PM
Redundancy strategy for 2848's
We have two 2848's performing core and access switching, and inter-vlan routing for our san and cpu nodes.
Since the 2848's do not support xrrp/vrrp, what other strategies are there to get some redundancy?
Is it practical to use two nics on each server with separate vlan's to separate switches and trunk the switches?
Since the 2848's do not support xrrp/vrrp, what other strategies are there to get some redundancy?
Is it practical to use two nics on each server with separate vlan's to separate switches and trunk the switches?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-25-2009 12:48 AM
тАО04-25-2009 12:48 AM
Re: Redundancy strategy for 2848's
2848 series switch unable L3 redundancy
therefore you must be only L2 redundancy with
spanning tree
or
connect each server,and each edge switch with two interface either 2848 switch
redundancy desing must be your network topology
please talk about more info your network
therefore you must be only L2 redundancy with
spanning tree
or
connect each server,and each edge switch with two interface either 2848 switch
redundancy desing must be your network topology
please talk about more info your network
cenk
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-27-2009 01:06 PM
тАО04-27-2009 01:06 PM
Re: Redundancy strategy for 2848's
Hi Cenk,
We have two storage nodes in a SAN and two cpu nodes for our virtualized infrastructure. We currently do not have enough devices to warrant separate core/edge switches.
I would like to configure the 2848's in the best possible way for failover. Meaning, if one switch dies, the cpu nodes can continue to access the SAN.
I had intended the SAN to be on VLAN1 and the serves on VLAN2, but was using the core switch for routing. Since the 2848's are 'lite l3', I can't use a vrrp or hsrp-equivalent protocol to make sure the gateway is accessible in event of switch failure.
My question is if there was another way to design the network so that there would be failover in case of switch failure.
thx,
-e
We have two storage nodes in a SAN and two cpu nodes for our virtualized infrastructure. We currently do not have enough devices to warrant separate core/edge switches.
I would like to configure the 2848's in the best possible way for failover. Meaning, if one switch dies, the cpu nodes can continue to access the SAN.
I had intended the SAN to be on VLAN1 and the serves on VLAN2, but was using the core switch for routing. Since the 2848's are 'lite l3', I can't use a vrrp or hsrp-equivalent protocol to make sure the gateway is accessible in event of switch failure.
My question is if there was another way to design the network so that there would be failover in case of switch failure.
thx,
-e
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-27-2009 11:33 PM
тАО04-27-2009 11:33 PM
Re: Redundancy strategy for 2848's
if you really need redundancy for your router, it's probably the simpelest to add devices (like two dedicated routers) that do support a redundancy protocol.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP