- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- SNMP Access Violation
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1753797
Members
7356
Online
108805
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-30-2006 12:27 AM
тАО03-30-2006 12:27 AM
SNMP Access Violation
I use NNM v7.01 to manage our ProCurve network (26xx, 28xx, 53xx). The management station is setup as an authorized SNMP manager on the switches, and is also configured as the trap receiver. All management works fine, and NNM can communicate with the switches without a problem. There are no indications from NNM (or PCM2.1+ which is integrated) that there are any problems. PCM+ does not show any access errors when I test communications to a switch.
The issue is that, occasionnally, I get all the switches sending traps saying;
SNMP Security access violation from
I have 'Send Authentication Traps' set to yes, which is why the traps are being generated, but I don't want to switch this off, as I may miss true violation attempts.
Can anyone try to explain why the switches think that there is a security violation from an authorized management station?
The issue is that, occasionnally, I get all the switches sending traps saying;
SNMP Security access violation from
I have 'Send Authentication Traps' set to yes, which is why the traps are being generated, but I don't want to switch this off, as I may miss true violation attempts.
Can anyone try to explain why the switches think that there is a security violation from an authorized management station?
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-30-2006 01:38 AM
тАО03-30-2006 01:38 AM
Re: SNMP Access Violation
Hello Tony,
Please contact support. It looks like this is fixed in E.10.31 for the 5300, H.08.92 for the 26xx and I.08.92 for the 28xx.
But you will have to contact support to get these versions as it is not on the web yet. They will also be able to tell you the reason for this eventlog entry.
Goodluck
Please contact support. It looks like this is fixed in E.10.31 for the 5300, H.08.92 for the 26xx and I.08.92 for the 28xx.
But you will have to contact support to get these versions as it is not on the web yet. They will also be able to tell you the reason for this eventlog entry.
Goodluck
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-30-2006 02:00 AM
тАО03-30-2006 02:00 AM
Re: SNMP Access Violation
Thanks for the info Eirram.
I'm suprised it's taken HP until this late in the life of the 26xx, 28xx and 53xx series of switches to notice/fix this problem.
One issue that may prevent me updating is the fact I'm using CDP for network mapping, and HP are removing the CDP code from all switches in favour of LLDP. I'm stuck with f/w 10.04 on the 5300's and 8.71 on the 26xx until I can move to LLDP.
I'm suprised it's taken HP until this late in the life of the 26xx, 28xx and 53xx series of switches to notice/fix this problem.
One issue that may prevent me updating is the fact I'm using CDP for network mapping, and HP are removing the CDP code from all switches in favour of LLDP. I'm stuck with f/w 10.04 on the 5300's and 8.71 on the 26xx until I can move to LLDP.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP