- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Small Failover Scenario
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-03-2008 12:46 AM
тАО09-03-2008 12:46 AM
I have a question to a failover scenario with 3 x ProCurve 2900 Switches.
I want to have 2 switches that communicate with each other, when 1 of the 3 switches fail.
I attached a plan, which shows, how I want to implement the switches.
Question:
Do I have to configure something or do I only need to link them like shown in the attachement?
Is there mybe a better solution with other switches?
Thank you for your help!
Regards
Denis
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-03-2008 01:07 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-03-2008 01:20 AM
тАО09-03-2008 01:20 AM
Re: Small Failover Scenario
you can trunk configuration each switch connection for more bandwith
and enable spaning tree protocol on all switch
spaning tree protocol loop prevent and L2 redundancy protocol
please look attachmend
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-03-2008 02:28 AM
тАО09-03-2008 02:28 AM
Re: Small Failover Scenario
They will help me a lot.
I have another question to this scenario:
Can I configure the trunks and spanning tree over the Personality Ports?
Regards
Denis
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-07-2008 10:55 PM
тАО09-07-2008 10:55 PM
Re: Small Failover Scenario
thanks for your help again.
I will cascade the switches over the 10 Gbit modules in the backplane.
So if one switch fails, the communication will run further on 2 switches.
Only the clients which are not redundant patched on the switches can't communicate.
I've attached the "cascading plan", to help hopefully other people too.
So if one Switch
Regards
Denis
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-07-2008 10:56 PM
тАО09-07-2008 10:56 PM