Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1752770 Members
5396 Online
108789 Solutions
New Discussion

Tagged and [no] Untagged confusion

 
VladS
New Member

Tagged and [no] Untagged confusion

Hello after a several years of working with cisco devises I started to work at company that works only with HP and this is very confusing

Now I know that tagged is a trunk and untagged stands for access but there is another one that call no untagged and I dont understand why

I need a port 47 to be in a vlan 11 it connected to firewall and port 20 to be in access vlan 11 that my PC connects to it and recieve DHCP from a FW

this is the configuration

 

hostname "SW-IT"
console idle-timeout 600
console idle-timeout serial-usb 600
ip default-gateway 192.168.12.253
interface 13
name "LAPTOP_VLAD"
exit
interface 22
name "PC_MICHAEL"
exit
interface 30
name "PC_BAR"
exit
interface 47
name "FGT_60D"
exit
snmp-server community "public" unrestricted
vlan 1
name " Lan"
no untagged 1-2,4,6-7,11-12,14,17,19-23,28,30,32-33,36-37,39-41,43,45-47
untagged 3,5,8-10,15-16,18,24-27,29,31,34-35,38,42,44,48-52
tagged 13
ip address dhcp-bootp
exit
vlan 11
name "Support Net"
untagged 1-2,4,6-7,11-14,17,19-21,23,28,30,32-33,36-37,39-41,43,45-47
tagged 22,27,48
ip address 11.1.1.253 255.255.255.0
exit
vlan 24
name "SURV"
no ip address
exit

3 REPLIES 3
SantoshPG
HPE Pro

Re: Tagged and [no] Untagged confusion

Here is a link of one of the post where this has been discussed link :- https://community.hpe.com/t5/Switches-Hubs-and-Modems/VLAN-Tagging-confusion/td-p/4715581 hope this helps

Also you might find this guide helpful since you were working with cisco devices before. Its a Aruba HPE Networking and Cisco CLI Reference Guide 

Link :- http://h20628.www2.hp.com/km-ext/kmcsdirect/emr_na-c04793912-4.pdf

Thank you,
I am an HPE employee
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Was the post useful? Click on Kudos Thumb below
Vince-Whirlwind
Honored Contributor

Re: Tagged and [no] Untagged confusion

"No untagged" is just for VLAN1 because it is the default untagged VLAN on every port unless it is removed using the "no untagged".

This is superior functionality to Cisco, because it allows you to have no untagged VLAN on a trunk, whereas with Cisco you have to create "black hole" VLANs to be the untagged VLAN on trunks instead of the default VLAN1.

PeteLong
Occasional Advisor

Re: Tagged and [no] Untagged confusion

My take on it

 
 
for what its worth
 
Pete