- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Re: ACL difference between 5406 and 2620
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2017 09:27 AM
05-03-2017 09:27 AM
ACL difference between 5406 and 2620
I deploy quite a few 5406 switches and use extended ACLs to create a guest network. I am trying to perform the same operation on a 2620 switch, however, I have noticed a difference in the available commands. On the 5406, I create the ACL then change to the VLAN context to apply the ACL via 'ip access-group "GuestNetwork" in'. When attempting to do the same on the 2620, the only option I can find is 'ip access-group "GuestNetwork" vlan'. I've been combing through the security guide for both models and read through the ACL sections, but I cannot determine what the difference is between the commands. Will both accomplish the same result?
- Tags:
- ACLs
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2017 05:29 PM
05-03-2017 05:29 PM
Re: ACL difference between 5406 and 2620
The 5400 is a fully-featured Layer-3 switch.
The 2620 is a cheapo switch that you shouldn't use for doing any routing. You could even ignore my last 4 words.