- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: 11.31 pseudo swap
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-11-2009 06:38 AM
тАО09-11-2009 06:38 AM
During a load test one of our database servers, the process died with the following message in the syslog file:
vmunix: Deferred swap reservation failure pid:
After searching, I saw that pseudo swap should always be used in this version of HP-UX.
What I don't understand is why keeps incrementing the reserved space.
In Tru64, this was controlled by a kernel parameter, as was before with the swapmem_on kernel parameter.
No other applications are running on this server besides the Oracle Database.
This means that I need a lot more of swap than my RAM, and now we are about to install new servers with 256 GB of RAM.
Attached is the memory usage during test with a load that the server was able to handle. But increasing the load (the number of test users), the swap reservation failure message appears again.
Is this normal or there is something that should enabled/tuned at the Oracle database?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-13-2009 01:54 AM
тАО09-13-2009 01:54 AM
Re: 11.31 pseudo swap
Can please check below thread. simliar to your problem
http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447626+1252835136279+28353475&threadId=364811
Current Swap as per your attachmnet output:-
8*3 = 24GB.
As per my understanding heard from some of my mentors advice to have swap sapce double the size of your psyical memory ? best pratice.
HTH,
Cheers,
Johnson
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-13-2009 04:25 AM
тАО09-13-2009 04:25 AM
Re: 11.31 pseudo swap
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-13-2009 07:24 PM
тАО09-13-2009 07:24 PM
SolutionNot "should" but "is".
>This means that I need a lot more of swap than my RAM, and now we are about to install new servers with 256 GB of RAM.
You either need more swap or RAM. You need enough total swap to match your Oracle requirements.
>Is this normal or there is something that should enabled/tuned at the Oracle database?
Yes to both. Until you get more swap, you need to tell Oracle to use less memory.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-13-2009 09:02 PM
тАО09-13-2009 09:02 PM
Re: 11.31 pseudo swap
This all seemed much easier in Tru64 didn't it?
There 'lazy' swap was just great, and we ran our benchmarks on hefty (many-GB) machines, with just 2 or 4 GB swap just in case we did not predict the usage correctly.
There was a recent topic on this, but it did not have a clear outcome at the time of this reply. There are some interesting reference in there though.
http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1367439
hth,
Hein.