- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- 11 vi2 and 11 vi3
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 03:49 AM
тАО11-17-2009 03:49 AM
Re: 11 vi2 and 11 vi3
No, only 10.30 was. (If you use the English definition of transitional, every OS version is. I assume you meant the music one, brief.)
>What was the difference?
10.30 had a limited distribution. Same as 10.10, 11.20 and 11.22.
>When at ATT, we used 10.30 on maybe 3,000 servers.
Then you were special.
>11.31 was originally marked exclusive to Integrity.
11.23 was originally for Integrity with PA support added a year later.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 06:18 AM
тАО11-17-2009 06:18 AM
Re: 11 vi2 and 11 vi3
> tedious attitude. [...]
And some people should work on the accuracy
of the information they supply.
> [...] its a personal problem [...]
"it's". Post less nonsense, and my "problem"
will disappear, as if by magic.
> 11.31 was orginally [...]
So, what's true now? What you said, or
something different?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 08:15 AM
тАО11-17-2009 08:15 AM
Re: 11 vi2 and 11 vi3
Obviously you weren't around for HP-UX 8 or 9 when HP-UX was Berkeley based. Then begin the transition into ATT based 10.00 which was complete until 11.00.
Steven
You are so predictable.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 08:34 AM
тАО11-17-2009 08:34 AM
Re: 11 vi2 and 11 vi3
to create and remove transition links from HP-UX release 9.x locations to
HP-UX 10.x locations...."
There are several example of left over BSD 9.0 versions of HP-UX in 10.20, and software still be written to make the move into ATT HP-UX. Page 14
http://docs.hp.com/en/5967-0005/5967-0005.pdf
BTW Dennis, you are the first HP-UX admin I've ever run into who didn't state 10.20 was transitional.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 11:12 AM
тАО11-17-2009 11:12 AM
Re: 11 vi2 and 11 vi3
> I've ever run into who didn't state 10.20
> was transitional.
Then I'll be the second one. It was not. But that depends on your definition of "transitional". If you're strictly speaking about a transition from BSD to SysV, then you're right, but 10.0 was even more major in that respect.
It is my opinion that BSD/SysV are details that will be irrelevant to a high-level architect who is just looking into deploying an infrastructure where millions in expenses are involved. That's the guy HP markets HP-UX to, and under that perspective, I think that HP's definition of "transitional" is one where the OS has been released to cater a specific technology need and will not be supported for long.
For example, AFAIK, 10.30 and many of the initial 11.1x Itanium versions were released as "transitional", under that definition. There were also special versions for the V class which I don't remember.
Olivier
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 12:12 PM
тАО11-17-2009 12:12 PM
Re: 11 vi2 and 11 vi3
Geez, you contradict yourself just jump into a pissing match.
This is real bore and typical of techies who refuse to back down and fight to the death rather than acknowledge a peer.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 04:19 PM
тАО11-17-2009 04:19 PM
Re: 11 vi2 and 11 vi3
IF your applications are running ok and you can get patches for your application and OS everything is ok.
If your application is no longer supported at 11.11 and you need a newer version of your applications that will require you to move to 11iv2 or 11iv3 then upgrade.
IF you need to replace the application running on 11.11 with a new application and that application runs on 11.31 or 11.23 then you need to upgrade.
You are probably running a system with limited amount of memory so 11.23 will require more memory.
This sounds like a redneck joke. You know you need to upgrade when .... (I live in georgia)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 10:33 PM
тАО11-17-2009 10:33 PM
Re: 11 vi2 and 11 vi3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-18-2009 12:00 AM
тАО11-18-2009 12:00 AM
Re: 11 vi2 and 11 vi3
I was around but then HP-UX was an appliance to me.
>BTW Dennis, you are the first HP-UX admin I've ever run into who didn't state 10.20 was transitional.
You are very confused. I never said I was an admin, I just play one on TV. I'm probably an admin's worst nightmare, I'm R&D. :-)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-18-2009 01:30 AM
тАО11-18-2009 01:30 AM