- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Does symbolic link consume IO
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 07:20 AM
тАО11-17-2009 07:20 AM
Does symbolic link consume IO
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 07:38 AM
тАО11-17-2009 07:38 AM
Re: Does symbolic link consume IO
to require a look-up to find the link text.
Knowing nothing about the OS or file system
involved, it's hard to be certain, but I'd
guess that someone would cache this value if
it's used frequently, so I wouldn't expect a
big penalty. And, in any case, the file name
is important only when opening a file, not
when reading from or writing to it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 07:48 AM
тАО11-17-2009 07:48 AM
Re: Does symbolic link consume IO
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 09:17 AM
тАО11-17-2009 09:17 AM
Re: Does symbolic link consume IO
I see no big penalty from doing things this way.
This seems like a good way to spread out i/o and relieve pressure on the underlying disk.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-17-2009 12:58 PM
тАО11-17-2009 12:58 PM
Re: Does symbolic link consume IO
Pretty minor, in other words, when compared to the traffic of a busy filesystem, but depending on the application it could add up.
If the add-up is a concern, then consider using a loopback filesystem mount in order to mount just the other disk's subdirectory at the old location.
http://docs.hp.com/en/B3921-90010/mount_lofs.1M.html
mount -F lofs /newdisk/data2 /olddisk/data/data2
Just make sure you document it very carefully so that some hapless future sysadmin doesn't think he or she can delete /newdisk/data2 because it's a "duplicate copy" of /olddisk/data/data2.