- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- EVA Disk Group Performance
Operating System - Linux
1752780
Members
6423
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-20-2011 08:58 AM
01-20-2011 08:58 AM
EVA Disk Group Performance
Hello, Oracle best practices recommended to implement a disk group for each Oracle database engine. how can it affect if I have two or more engines in the same diskgroup?
Oracle 10.2.0 RHEL 5.4
EVA 8400
thank you very much.
Oracle 10.2.0 RHEL 5.4
EVA 8400
thank you very much.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-21-2011 09:43 AM
01-21-2011 09:43 AM
Re: EVA Disk Group Performance
The EVA8400 is a fairly "good" and fast array. I do not know where you got that best practice from but what it probably meant was to have a separate DG for your "hot" Oracle "files" -- i.e. archive log, redo log, etc.
DG1 will be likely for your main DataFiles for howevr many Oracle Instance you wish to stash there
DG2 will likely be for your archive logs, redos, etc.
Note however the rules: disk members should be in multiples of 8 and the larger the disk count, the higher performaning will be your Vdisks (more spindles engaged)
We however sticked with one very large (240 Disks) Diskgroup -- with about a dozen large Databases on 'em (ASM). WHat we do as added best practice is to have multiple large Vdisks (we've settled for 200 to 400 GB sized Vdisks) so the DB instance can load balance / stripe accross the controllers.
HTH...
DG1 will be likely for your main DataFiles for howevr many Oracle Instance you wish to stash there
DG2 will likely be for your archive logs, redos, etc.
Note however the rules: disk members should be in multiples of 8 and the larger the disk count, the higher performaning will be your Vdisks (more spindles engaged)
We however sticked with one very large (240 Disks) Diskgroup -- with about a dozen large Databases on 'em (ASM). WHat we do as added best practice is to have multiple large Vdisks (we've settled for 200 to 400 GB sized Vdisks) so the DB instance can load balance / stripe accross the controllers.
HTH...
Hakuna Matata.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP