- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Filesystem Buffer Cache
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-18-2001 05:00 AM
тАО09-18-2001 05:00 AM
Filesystem Buffer Cache
Most HP systems onsite use the default dynamic settings and I would like some evidence to show the Unix administrators that the cache is either sized correctly or not.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-18-2001 05:03 AM
тАО09-18-2001 05:03 AM
Re: Filesystem Buffer Cache
-Santosh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-18-2001 05:07 AM
тАО09-18-2001 05:07 AM
Re: Filesystem Buffer Cache
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-18-2001 05:50 PM
тАО09-18-2001 05:50 PM
Re: Filesystem Buffer Cache
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-18-2001 07:54 PM
тАО09-18-2001 07:54 PM
Re: Filesystem Buffer Cache
Try this,
$echo "print TBL_BUFFER_CACHE_USED" > rept
$/opt/perf/bin/glance -adviser_only -i 1 -j 1 -syntax rept
This will continously report the buffer cache usage. Also, you can varie the values of i and j to get the desired interval and iterations.
-Sri
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-18-2001 11:21 PM
тАО09-18-2001 11:21 PM
Re: Filesystem Buffer Cache
What I need to know is how much of that 512Mb is actually in use.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2001 03:45 AM
тАО09-19-2001 03:45 AM
Re: Filesystem Buffer Cache
sar -b will tell you % of hits reads in buffer cache.
GPM Reports->system info -> system tables must show the information you want.
Reduce dbc_max_pct and dbc_min_pct and check with sar -b. Values down 85% means troubles with buffer cache.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2001 03:50 AM
тАО09-19-2001 03:50 AM
Re: Filesystem Buffer Cache
> 512Mb is actually in use.
All of it. Like the name says, the Filesystem Buffer Cache is a cache and a good cache is always kept full. Like you write, *only* if the memory pressure from processes/data becomes too high, the DBC will shrink. If the DBC is at its maximum, then apparently the memory presuure from processes/data is not too high.
The process/data memory also acts like a cache, but it is not kept totally full. The system will try to keep a few perecent free in order to let small interactive processes start quickly. That is why (Glance et al) memory usage percentages of around 95 are quite normal, but anything above some 97% indicates memory pressure.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2001 06:31 AM
тАО09-19-2001 06:31 AM
Re: Filesystem Buffer Cache
To convince Unix administrators of this fact needs evidence that a reduction will not in itself cause a performance problem. How do I provide evidence if, as indicated cache usage will always be full and read 100% and write >60% usage high.
I assume each f/s entry in the filesystem cache will take up space i.e nKB, and if there are n filesystems then could this be used to size the filesystem buffer cache correctly n x nKB. Or could another calculation be done.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2001 09:29 AM
тАО09-19-2001 09:29 AM
Re: Filesystem Buffer Cache
In my servers i have reduce to 2 to 5 %min and max, for large memory, and 5 to 10 for 1GB boxes, and i cant see any problems. But my database is configured to raw devices, wich avoid double cache.
If you read Fanks response carefully, he says that if cache is on its high value there is not any reason for decrease.
Of course you can reduce buffer cache and increase database cache. I think it is a good idea too.