- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Methods for system backup
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2013 09:56 AM
06-24-2013 09:56 AM
Methods for system backup
I'm aware of the following backup methods:
- local tape drive
- remote tape drive
- to a remote ignite server
- using Disk Mirror and then splitting the mirror to preserve the original configuration
Are there any others, and if so, what are the ins and outs to them.
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2013 10:08 AM
06-24-2013 10:08 AM
Re: Methods for system backup
In case of OS "backups" you may consider DRD too.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2013 05:20 PM - edited 06-24-2013 05:21 PM
06-24-2013 05:20 PM - edited 06-24-2013 05:21 PM
Re: Methods for system backup
- local tape drive
Always works well.
- remote tape drive
Only one corner case (fbackup) will work unless using a special backup package
- to a remote ignite server
The usual for large data centers.
- using Disk Mirror and then splitting the mirror to preserve the original configuration
Disk mirroring is only useful when a disk fails. It is useless if somone accidently writes over the boot disk.
..DRD is only available for more recent versions of HP-UX.
There are three boot disk problems: disk hardware failure where mirror disk protects vg00, someone (with root privileges) writes over the vg00 disk and smoke-and-rubble where vg00 must be reinstalled.
There is no substitute for Ignite. You could experiment with a dd copy but the destination disk must be installed in the same slot as the original in order to boot and run. If you have no tape drive and no disk mirror software, dd is about all there is.
Using NFS to backup is worthless to recover since the dead server can't be booted to enable networking.
DVDs are too small to hold a typical vg00 backup. A boot CD can be used to bring an Ignite menu up but you need either an ignite tape or a working ignite server to restore.
That takes care of vg00.
For the other volumes, fbackup is the tool of choice. While HP has decided to abandon this program, it is still the best (and fastest) tool for tape backup. The other backup tools are limited to files less than 9GB and single threaded limiting maximum tape speed.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2013 02:10 AM
06-25-2013 02:10 AM
Re: Methods for system backup
>The other backup tools are limited to files less than 9 GB
pax (and Data Protector of course) don't have this limitation.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2013 06:06 AM
06-25-2013 06:06 AM
Re: Methods for system backup
Yes, I agree with the Ignite being the best approach. Unfortunately, the BEAN-Counting, middle managing, pencil pushers only see the dollars involved. Even when I explain to them that it's 20-30 min backup and the same to restore, they look at me like I just don't understand their point... This after I tell them that it's hours or days (depending on what is supported/configured along with the base OS) to do this manually. And even with all that, there's no guarantee that the end point of the restore is exactly what you started with, even if you are unconcerned with the loss of user data.
With disk mirroring, at least I can split the mirror to preserve the system.
DRD should be good as the systems that need to be preserved are mostly v3, with only a single v2 system. I believe the v2 system qualifies as well, based on the date of the disks originally used to build the system. It appears that DRD is available as a "free" download. In the past, I've used fbackup extensively and exclusively, and it produced very reliable results. But it's another one of those "old" UNIX utils that can get people by w/o the need to "purchase" anything (much), so no big surprise that HP abandoned it.
Thx.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2013 07:22 AM
06-25-2013 07:22 AM
Re: Methods for system backup
sorry for jumping in to ask a (related) question...
i believe the man page for fbackup makes dire warnings about backing up to an nfs mount. is that because of the challenge of restoring or is it something else?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2013 11:22 AM
06-25-2013 11:22 AM
Re: Methods for system backup
Any backup over NFS is risky. The protocol is just too risky for backing up even a few gigabytes. It is also heavy on overhead so throughput is a major concern. Most of the modern drives like LTO3 and later are too fast for simple disks, and the network speed even at Gbit speed cannot keep up with the tape drive. This means massive repositioning (read: excess wear). Here's a summary of the native data speeds for each tape format:
Type MB/sec
LTO1 = 20
LTO2 = 40
LTO3 = 80
LTO4 = 120
LTO5 = 140
LTO6 = 160
A typical internal SCSI disk drive can keep data streaming from 20-80 MB/sec, SAS (JBOD) can push 100, but none of them can keep up with compressible data (which is often quoted at 2:1).
Certainly you can use NFS but it can be very quirky, and restoring can also be tricky. NFS is useless for a vg00 restore (there is no NFS on a dead system).
Using NFS negates most of the advantages of fbackup with up to 6 threads reading data at the same time.
As far as management goes, I'm sure they have not wasted any money on fire extinguishers and sprinklers, DR locations or even insurance policies. After all, they cost money and don't do anything...just like a backup.
Obviously your company has never experienced the financial disaster caused by a data center outage or even a disk array failure that takes down every client for 3 days. There are many businesses that no longer exist because of data that colud not be recovered.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2013 11:36 AM
06-25-2013 11:36 AM
Re: Methods for system backup
By the way, I recently did an ignite backup of a rx2800 i4 using a LTO-6 in about 10 minutes, restored in about 15 minutes
;-)
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2013 07:36 PM
06-25-2013 07:36 PM
Re: Methods for system backup
>I believe the man page for fbackup makes dire warnings about backing up to a NFS mount.
I only see comments about backing up A NFS filesystem, not to one.