- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: Multiple ftpd daemons
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2009 05:51 AM
тАО10-09-2009 05:51 AM
Re: Multiple ftpd daemons
Steven - Firstly, thanks for your input. I appreciate it.
Secondly, please mind your own business. Allow me to remind you that this forum is not intended for debating on personal opions or personal perceptions. People deserve points based on their input. People get zero point based on responses that provides no value other than trying to outsmart the requester. My initial question was very simple: "Can I technically run multiple FTPd daemons on a same server?" So the answer would have been YES or NO then the subject matter could be elaborated further with the question: "Why would you do that?"
Please learn from others, especially from SEP who first responded like a PRO. There is a reason why SEP is now part of the Elite team based on his points track record.
Thank you all for your assistance. I am good to move on with my tasks.
Best Regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2009 07:30 AM
тАО10-09-2009 07:30 AM
Re: Multiple ftpd daemons
You read way to much into my question. I personally don't care what you do, if it makes you happy. I asked the question because many people of this site seem to try to make simple things more complex. If I know what you want to do, or accomplish, I can better help. You may have not actually needed multiple ftp daemons to accomplish your goal. But it's nice to know that you can take a simple question as a truly sarcastic remark.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2009 08:03 AM
тАО10-09-2009 08:03 AM
Re: Multiple ftpd daemons
>[...]I asked the question because many people of this site seem to try to make simple things more complex[...]
You summarized it well. Unconciously, you underestimate people's knowledge. Sometimes people do things in a complex way not because they don't know or they want to. Sometimes they have to do it 'cause they are mandated to do so even it's against their will.
As a member of the forum, I would never question why people wants to do things the way they want. I only offer info, suggestions and alternative solutions to other members.
I apologize for any mis-understandings if I have read too much into your question. I guess everyone has his/her own manner. Good or bad is subjective.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2009 08:28 AM
тАО10-09-2009 08:28 AM
Re: Multiple ftpd daemons
Apparently that's too complex a reason in
this situation.
> [...] Unconciously, you underestimate
> people's knowledge. [...]
Amazing.
As this example illustrates so well, a low
estimate is not automatically an
underestimate.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2009 08:34 AM
тАО10-09-2009 08:34 AM
Re: Multiple ftpd daemons
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2009 09:00 AM
тАО10-09-2009 09:00 AM
Re: Multiple ftpd daemons
I joined way back for knowlege enhancement and learning. It does not mean I worked on subject matter nor have expertise like you guys.
Steven & Court - You guys are amazing. You do have big ego and a lot of time on your hands.
Please cut the crap and move on. There is no more points to pursue this.
Once again, Steven mind your own business. You seem not getting that, don't you. There is no need for you to start a three-way dispute since nothing was initially addresed to you.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2009 09:01 AM
тАО10-09-2009 09:01 AM
Re: Multiple ftpd daemons
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2009 10:29 AM
тАО10-09-2009 10:29 AM
Re: Multiple ftpd daemons
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2009 12:55 PM
тАО10-09-2009 12:55 PM
Re: Multiple ftpd daemons
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2009 01:40 PM
тАО10-09-2009 01:40 PM
Re: Multiple ftpd daemons
have one last question.
> [...] Sometimes people do things in a
> complex way not because they don't know or
> they want to. Sometimes they have to do it
> 'cause they are mandated to do so even it's
> against their will.
Does this mean that you knew that you were
pursuing a "solution" which might be
completely ineffective, if not downright
foolish, and you _still_ think that people
who asked you why you wanted to do it were
underestimating your knowledge?
> It's so sad to see [...]
Yup. It sure is.