- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: RedHat Linux and emcpower files
Operating System - Linux
1753338
Members
4876
Online
108792
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-18-2011 08:15 AM
тАО03-18-2011 08:15 AM
RedHat Enterprise 5.4 (Tikanga)
Fibre disks presented by EMC Clarion.
In my environment one Red Hat server has its Clarion devices mounted in two different ways within fstab.
/dev/emcpowera1 /usr1 ext3 defaults 0 0
/dev/emcpowerc /usr2 ext3 defaults 0 0
/dev/emcpowerb /usr3 ext3 defaults 0 0
All three file systems are usable and seem to be performing well.
Is it incorrect to create file systems directly at the device level without using a partition? (/dev/emcpowerc)??
Are both methods acceptable?
Is there any downside to not creating the partition?
I will never need to carve these luns up. The entire disk is dedicated to a single file system. In two of these cases the file systems are a TB or larger.
I am particularly concerned if there is any danger to the data or a performance hit of any sort.
Thank you.
Fibre disks presented by EMC Clarion.
In my environment one Red Hat server has its Clarion devices mounted in two different ways within fstab.
/dev/emcpowera1 /usr1 ext3 defaults 0 0
/dev/emcpowerc /usr2 ext3 defaults 0 0
/dev/emcpowerb /usr3 ext3 defaults 0 0
All three file systems are usable and seem to be performing well.
Is it incorrect to create file systems directly at the device level without using a partition? (/dev/emcpowerc)??
Are both methods acceptable?
Is there any downside to not creating the partition?
I will never need to carve these luns up. The entire disk is dedicated to a single file system. In two of these cases the file systems are a TB or larger.
I am particularly concerned if there is any danger to the data or a performance hit of any sort.
Thank you.
Solved! Go to Solution.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-18-2011 11:28 AM
тАО03-18-2011 11:28 AM
Re: RedHat Linux and emcpower files
Shalom,
You are better off using lvm after emc is properly installed.
Using lvm enables you to add a lun to the volume group and extend the file system without downtime.
partition with fdisk
pvcreate
vgcreate
lvcreate
mkfs.ext3
SEP
You are better off using lvm after emc is properly installed.
Using lvm enables you to add a lun to the volume group and extend the file system without downtime.
partition with fdisk
pvcreate
vgcreate
lvcreate
mkfs.ext3
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-18-2011 11:53 AM
тАО03-18-2011 11:53 AM
Solution
Both methods are workable. However, I would recommend using LVM instead.
When you don't have a partition:
+ you are not restricted by the 2 TB hard maximum size limit of the traditional PC partition table
- if the SAN administrator makes a mistake and accidentally presents the same disk to a Windows host too, the disk will look like unpartitioned space to Windows
- you cannot migrate your data to another disk (or disks) on-line without stopping the applications and unmounting the filesystem
- maximum filesystem size can be no greater than the size of a single disk/LUN
? expanding the filesystem on-line may be possible, if you increase the size of the LUN and use the "partprobe" command to make the system re-detect the LUN size. However, changing the size of active LUNs is risky.
When you do use a partition:
+ if the SAN administrator accidentally presents the disk to a Windows host, Windows can detect the disk is already partitioned and obviously in use
- expanding the filesystem is even more difficult than in the previous case, with the same risks
- you cannot migrate your data to another disk (or disks) on-line without stopping the applications and unmounting the filesystem
- with the traditional PC partitioning technology, 2 TB is the absolute maximum disk/LUN size
- maximum filesystem size can be no greater than the size of a single disk/LUN
When you use LVM:
+ you are not restricted by the 2 TB hard maximum size limit of the traditional PC partition table
? if the SAN administrator makes a mistake and accidentally presents the same disk to a Windows host too, the disk will look like unpartitioned space to Windows
(but if you worry about this, you can use a partition table with LVM too)
+ on-line data migration is possible: you can move your data from one storage system to another while filesystems are mounted and applications are using them
+ you can make a volume group out of multiple physical volumes, and create a single large logical volume over all of them = you can have filesystems larger than any single disk/LUN
+ on-line extending filesystems is easy: add another disk/LUN to the same volume group as the disk you need extended, then expand your logical volume to use it too, then expand the filesystem to use the new space
In my opinion, the ability to migrate the data from one storage to another while it's being used is very important: after 3-5 years, your Clarion will change from a "shiny new thing" to "old clunker for which is impossible to get a reasonably-priced support agreement any more". At that point, you will have a new, bigger storage system and you'll want to move your data to it and get rid of the old one. That will be *much* easier if you can migrate the data with no downtime.
MK
When you don't have a partition:
+ you are not restricted by the 2 TB hard maximum size limit of the traditional PC partition table
- if the SAN administrator makes a mistake and accidentally presents the same disk to a Windows host too, the disk will look like unpartitioned space to Windows
- you cannot migrate your data to another disk (or disks) on-line without stopping the applications and unmounting the filesystem
- maximum filesystem size can be no greater than the size of a single disk/LUN
? expanding the filesystem on-line may be possible, if you increase the size of the LUN and use the "partprobe" command to make the system re-detect the LUN size. However, changing the size of active LUNs is risky.
When you do use a partition:
+ if the SAN administrator accidentally presents the disk to a Windows host, Windows can detect the disk is already partitioned and obviously in use
- expanding the filesystem is even more difficult than in the previous case, with the same risks
- you cannot migrate your data to another disk (or disks) on-line without stopping the applications and unmounting the filesystem
- with the traditional PC partitioning technology, 2 TB is the absolute maximum disk/LUN size
- maximum filesystem size can be no greater than the size of a single disk/LUN
When you use LVM:
+ you are not restricted by the 2 TB hard maximum size limit of the traditional PC partition table
? if the SAN administrator makes a mistake and accidentally presents the same disk to a Windows host too, the disk will look like unpartitioned space to Windows
(but if you worry about this, you can use a partition table with LVM too)
+ on-line data migration is possible: you can move your data from one storage system to another while filesystems are mounted and applications are using them
+ you can make a volume group out of multiple physical volumes, and create a single large logical volume over all of them = you can have filesystems larger than any single disk/LUN
+ on-line extending filesystems is easy: add another disk/LUN to the same volume group as the disk you need extended, then expand your logical volume to use it too, then expand the filesystem to use the new space
In my opinion, the ability to migrate the data from one storage to another while it's being used is very important: after 3-5 years, your Clarion will change from a "shiny new thing" to "old clunker for which is impossible to get a reasonably-priced support agreement any more". At that point, you will have a new, bigger storage system and you'll want to move your data to it and get rid of the old one. That will be *much* easier if you can migrate the data with no downtime.
MK
MK
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP