- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- >
- Restoring Tru64 UNIX from a replica of its disk - ...
Operating System - Tru64 Unix
1748186
Members
4195
Online
108759
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-22-2005 02:01 PM
тАО07-22-2005 02:01 PM
Restoring Tru64 UNIX from a replica of its disk - CA/EVA
Hi All,
I present this question specifically for Tru64 UNIX as we have a large number of these hosts. However, I am currently testing the same concept on RedHat Linux, Windows 2003 & possibly Sun Solaris as well. I might post my results on these other OSs on the forum once I get them.
As the procedure is detailed, I have attached a document which explains the steps of our tests and the bottlenecks.
In brief, a host running Tru64 UNIX (V5.1B) booting off the SAN (EVA 5000; VCS 3.020)has a couple of Vdisks presented to it. It uses one of them to boot and the other one is there for its data partition. These two Vdisks are replicated (Failsafe Mode:Disabled; Write Mode: Synchronous) to another EVA 5000 Array (destination EVA) running the same VCS Version 3.020. To simulate the failure of an EVA (primary EVA), the host is shutdown, DR Group deleted, fabric zoning re-configured to allow the host in question to access the destination
EVA and to revoke access to the primary one.The replicated Vdisks "WriteProtect" is disabled, WWN of the LUN is the same on the replicated Vdisks and they are allocated the same LUN and presented to the same host--->the host is configured at the SRM layer for the disks from destination array--->the result is the host boots off successfully however the disk device name changes!!!
This is the bit we are expecting to not go through....i.e. in a nutshell if the WWN of the LUN is the same between the original disk and replicated Vdisk and the LUN is the same (although we notice that the UUID changes on these disks and ofcourse the Controller WWN at the SRM layer is different)....why does the disk device name change??
Surely, there is gotta be a transparent operation or someone has tested a smooth restore of systems using CA!!
Any thoughts guys?
P.S. A hp call in this regard is in its early stage!
Have a read of the document...some of you might find the results interesting!!
Regards,
Saket.
I present this question specifically for Tru64 UNIX as we have a large number of these hosts. However, I am currently testing the same concept on RedHat Linux, Windows 2003 & possibly Sun Solaris as well. I might post my results on these other OSs on the forum once I get them.
As the procedure is detailed, I have attached a document which explains the steps of our tests and the bottlenecks.
In brief, a host running Tru64 UNIX (V5.1B) booting off the SAN (EVA 5000; VCS 3.020)has a couple of Vdisks presented to it. It uses one of them to boot and the other one is there for its data partition. These two Vdisks are replicated (Failsafe Mode:Disabled; Write Mode: Synchronous) to another EVA 5000 Array (destination EVA) running the same VCS Version 3.020. To simulate the failure of an EVA (primary EVA), the host is shutdown, DR Group deleted, fabric zoning re-configured to allow the host in question to access the destination
EVA and to revoke access to the primary one.The replicated Vdisks "WriteProtect" is disabled, WWN of the LUN is the same on the replicated Vdisks and they are allocated the same LUN and presented to the same host--->the host is configured at the SRM layer for the disks from destination array--->the result is the host boots off successfully however the disk device name changes!!!
This is the bit we are expecting to not go through....i.e. in a nutshell if the WWN of the LUN is the same between the original disk and replicated Vdisk and the LUN is the same (although we notice that the UUID changes on these disks and ofcourse the Controller WWN at the SRM layer is different)....why does the disk device name change??
Surely, there is gotta be a transparent operation or someone has tested a smooth restore of systems using CA!!
Any thoughts guys?
P.S. A hp call in this regard is in its early stage!
Have a read of the document...some of you might find the results interesting!!
Regards,
Saket.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-22-2005 06:04 PM
тАО07-22-2005 06:04 PM
Re: Restoring Tru64 UNIX from a replica of its disk - CA/EVA
Saket,
Unfortunately the DDR database in Tru64 is such that somehow even though the WWNs for the LUN remain the same, it recognizes that the FA on the EVA has a different WWN and treats it as a different device. You are able to boot off of the first device since the DDR has not come into play yet.
The best way to get around would be to have dfsmgr -m /dev/disk/dskxx /dev/disk/dskyy
where dskyy is what you want it to be and dskxx is what it comes up with.
I have faced this in our Disaster recovery drill.
thanks
DP
Unfortunately the DDR database in Tru64 is such that somehow even though the WWNs for the LUN remain the same, it recognizes that the FA on the EVA has a different WWN and treats it as a different device. You are able to boot off of the first device since the DDR has not come into play yet.
The best way to get around would be to have dfsmgr -m /dev/disk/dskxx /dev/disk/dskyy
where dskyy is what you want it to be and dskxx is what it comes up with.
I have faced this in our Disaster recovery drill.
thanks
DP
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-24-2005 05:53 PM
тАО07-24-2005 05:53 PM
Re: Restoring Tru64 UNIX from a replica of its disk - CA/EVA
Maybe i didn't understand your procedure completly, but did you use the "CA failover" on the EVA vdisks?
I have used that in the past and after the system rebooted, All was fine again (but running on the other EVA)
I have used that in the past and after the system rebooted, All was fine again (but running on the other EVA)
Watch, Think and Tinker.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP