- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: backup data
Operating System - Linux
1752717
Members
5637
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-06-2004 08:32 AM
тАО09-06-2004 08:32 AM
hi
is it correct to backup data with:
tar cjpf /opt/save/backup-www-` date +%Y-%m-%d `.tbz /srv/www
regards
chris
is it correct to backup data with:
tar cjpf /opt/save/backup-www-` date +%Y-%m-%d `.tbz /srv/www
regards
chris
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-06-2004 08:57 AM
тАО09-06-2004 08:57 AM
Re: backup data
sorry, I mean
tar cjpf /opt/save/backup-www-` date +%Y-%m-%d `.tbz /srv/www
to get more compressed.
tar cjpf /opt/save/backup-www-` date +%Y-%m-%d `.tbz /srv/www
to get more compressed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-06-2004 10:12 PM
тАО09-06-2004 10:12 PM
Re: backup data
Hi Chris, call me lazy, but why to a process to do this when there's a tool that can do it for you!!
Read up on the manpage for logrotate which:
"is designed to ease administration of systems that generate large numbers of log files. It allows auto├В┬нmatic rotation, compression, removal, and mailing of log files. Each log file may be handled daily, weekly, monthly, or when it grows too large."
We actually use it to clean out the /tmp directory and other minor maintenance things, we are thinking of using it to generate on-line backups of our web servers too...
However, you might well be able to tinker with it to do the same with your web-sites to ensure you have easy access to backups.
If this is only an ad-hoc thing, then I don't see any problems with it, although I'd use tar -zcvf to do a compressed .tar.gz file myself, but that's a personal preference thing
Read up on the manpage for logrotate which:
"is designed to ease administration of systems that generate large numbers of log files. It allows auto├В┬нmatic rotation, compression, removal, and mailing of log files. Each log file may be handled daily, weekly, monthly, or when it grows too large."
We actually use it to clean out the /tmp directory and other minor maintenance things, we are thinking of using it to generate on-line backups of our web servers too...
However, you might well be able to tinker with it to do the same with your web-sites to ensure you have easy access to backups.
If this is only an ad-hoc thing, then I don't see any problems with it, although I'd use tar -zcvf to do a compressed .tar.gz file myself, but that's a personal preference thing
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-07-2004 12:04 AM
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP