- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: make_tape_recovery on multiuser mode.
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-06-2009 08:41 AM
тАО08-06-2009 08:41 AM
make_tape_recovery on multiuser mode.
For full system back is that mandatory to go to single user mode and create make_tape_recovery. Shall i do that on muliti user mode ( all the user application's in stopped condition ). Can someone tell whether it will create any problem?
Thanks,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-06-2009 08:46 AM
тАО08-06-2009 08:46 AM
Re: make_tape_recovery on multiuser mode.
There is no reason not to perform an Ignite 'make_tape_recovery' in normal, multi-user mode.
It is assumed that all you are backing up is the standard vg00 logical volumes. Therefore aside from log and temporary spool files which may be actively changing, your configuration files, scripts and executables should be static.
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-06-2009 08:46 AM
тАО08-06-2009 08:46 AM
Re: make_tape_recovery on multiuser mode.
Theory says to have the data in consistent state, the system should be as quiet as possible.
In real life running in Multi User mode should cause little to no problems, but of course it could happen that you end up with some corrupt files.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-06-2009 08:52 AM
тАО08-06-2009 08:52 AM
Re: make_tape_recovery on multiuser mode.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-06-2009 10:22 AM
тАО08-06-2009 10:22 AM
Re: make_tape_recovery on multiuser mode.
Now file1 has old data and file2 has newer data. So for any database program, you must use a backup program tailored to the database itself, that is, one that puts the database into read-only or backup mode.
After saying all that, you see why you should always backup vg00 (only) with Ignite and never load database files onto vg00. 99% of the time, there won't be any problems with normal vg00 files getting out of sync.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-06-2009 11:38 AM
тАО08-06-2009 11:38 AM
Re: make_tape_recovery on multiuser mode.
the make_tape_recovery is normal to run in multiuser mode.
its a daily task for backup.
mikap
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-06-2009 06:18 PM
тАО08-06-2009 06:18 PM