HPE Community read-only access December 15, 2018
This is a maintenance upgrade. You will be able to read articles and posts, but not post or reply.
Hours:
Dec 15, 4:00 am to 10:00 am UTC
Dec 14, 10:00 pm CST to Dec 15, 4:00 am CST
Dec 14, 8:00 pm PST to Dec 15, 2:00 am PST
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

output "bdf" isn't correct

 
SOLVED
Go to solution
centurion
Frequent Advisor

output "bdf" isn't correct

/dev/vgsap/lvsapdata5
524156928 51168 520025208 0% /oracle/SID/sapdata5

There is nothing stored in the filesystem. But there is a lack about 4GB ?!

HPUX 11.31
18 REPLIES
Jose Mosquera
Honored Contributor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

Hi,

Hints:
Before mounting the file system ensures that mounting point directory are empty.
If you have used some .dbf file inside of this mounting point you must shutdown your Oracle instance to release used space.

Rgds.
Manix
Honored Contributor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

Looks like a very big file system 524 Gigs
and there are some meta data space reservations
for every vxfs file systems say around 1% or slightly less than that.

However in your case it`s < 1 % ,4 Gigs.

This is pretty much expected behavior.

Thanks
Manix
HP-UX been always lovable - Mani Kalra
centurion
Frequent Advisor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

oracle is not running at the moment. there are only a few folders without content.

at the production system I have the same size of filesystem, but there it's ok:

/dev/sap/lvsapdata1
524156928 523573856 578568 100% /oracle/SID/sapdata1


I remount all filesystems, but no way.

Any ideas?

Jose Mosquera
Honored Contributor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

Hi,

Please check if your file system is really free or is busy by any process:
#fuser -u /dev/vgsap/lvsapdata5

Rgds.
Jose Mosquera
Honored Contributor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

Hi,

Have you checked the current file system consistency by "fsck" command?

Rgds.
centurion
Frequent Advisor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

The filesystem is free..

root@de06s209 [/oracle/TF3]# fuser -u /dev/vgtf3/lvsapdata5
/dev/vgtf3/lvsapdata5:
centurion
Frequent Advisor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

fsck is working without errors
Jose Mosquera
Honored Contributor
Solution

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

Hi,

How many space report "du -k" command?

Also please remember that your disk manager subsystem reserves several space for internal uses, metadata, etc.

Rgds.
centurion
Frequent Advisor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

the du -sk looks good:

8 /oracle/SID/sapdata5


About reservation/metadatas, see my entry above about our production system. There it's ok.
Jose Mosquera
Honored Contributor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

Hi Centurion,

I agree with the previous assessment of Manix, please consider spending of 1% or less for internal management of your disk manager.

Rgds.
centurion
Frequent Advisor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

Jose, I'am with you. But are you shure?

Because on our other system, the same configuration, we haven't these less for internal management ?!


Jose Mosquera
Honored Contributor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

Hi again,

Have you the same patch level in both systems?
centurion
Frequent Advisor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

the sole difference is, that the affected system is a vpar..
Jose Mosquera
Honored Contributor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

What show you this output command in both systems:
#fstyp -v /dev/vgsap/lvsapdata5
centurion
Frequent Advisor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

system with bad bdf:

vxfs
version: 6
f_bsize: 8192
f_frsize: 8192
f_blocks: 65519616
f_bfree: 65513220
f_bavail: 65001398
f_files: 16434400
f_ffree: 16378304
f_favail: 16378304
f_fsid: 1073872907
f_basetype: vxfs
f_namemax: 254
f_magic: a501fcf5
f_featurebits: 0
f_flag: 16
f_fsindex: 9
f_size: 65519616



system with good bdf:

vxfs
version: 6
f_bsize: 8192
f_frsize: 8192
f_blocks: 65519616
f_bfree: 9194609
f_bavail: 9122777
f_files: 2308640
f_ffree: 2298624
f_favail: 2298624
f_fsid: 1073807370
f_basetype: vxfs
f_namemax: 254
f_magic: a501fcf5
f_featurebits: 0
f_flag: 16
f_fsindex: 9
f_size: 65519616
Jose Mosquera
Honored Contributor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

Are you using a Disk Array, is the same for both? Or are using separate disk devices?
Same RAID Layout for both?
Are there the same mount options for both boxes on /etc/fstab files?

Have you created both Volume Groups with the same physical_extent_size, please attach the outputs of:
#vgdisplay -v vgsap
centurion
Frequent Advisor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

everything is the same (storage-box, raid, pe, pe-size,..).

I made now a newfs and I have the same value as before. I think there is a difference to the hpux vpar-vesion. :-(
Torsten.
Acclaimed Contributor

Re: output "bdf" isn't correct

I'm 100% sure it is not related to vPars...

Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.

__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.

__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!

If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!