- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- System Administration
- >
- Re: rcp vs ftp advice
-
-
Forums
- Products
- Servers and Operating Systems
- Storage
- Software
- Services
- HPE GreenLake
- Company
- Events
- Webinars
- Partner Solutions and Certifications
- Local Language
- China - 简体中文
- Japan - 日本語
- Korea - 한국어
- Taiwan - 繁體中文
-
- Advancing Life & Work
- Advantage EX
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- HPE Ezmeral: Uncut
- OEM Solutions
- Servers & Systems: The Right Compute
- Tech Insights
- The Cloud Experience Everywhere
- HPE Blog, Austria, Germany & Switzerland
- Blog HPE, France
- HPE Blog, Italy
- HPE Blog, Japan
- HPE Blog, Middle East
- HPE Blog, Latin America
- HPE Blog, Russia
- HPE Blog, Saudi Arabia
- HPE Blog, South Africa
- HPE Blog, UK & Ireland
- HPE Blog, Poland
-
Blogs
- Advancing Life & Work
- Advantage EX
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- HPE Blog, Latin America
- HPE Blog, Middle East
- HPE Blog, Saudi Arabia
- HPE Blog, South Africa
- HPE Blog, UK & Ireland
- HPE Ezmeral: Uncut
- OEM Solutions
- Servers & Systems: The Right Compute
- Tech Insights
- The Cloud Experience Everywhere
-
Information
- Community
- Welcome
- Getting Started
- FAQ
- Ranking Overview
- Rules of Participation
- Tips and Tricks
- Resources
- Announcements
- Email us
- Feedback
- Information Libraries
- Integrated Systems
- Networking
- Servers
- Storage
- Other HPE Sites
- Support Center
- Aruba Airheads Community
- Enterprise.nxt
- HPE Dev Community
- Cloud28+ Community
- Marketplace
-
Forums
-
Forums
-
Blogs
-
Information
-
English
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-12-2006 10:40 AM
09-12-2006 10:40 AM
The objective is to use unattended cron scripts that are pretty much bullet proof. So the criteria is how consistent either method would be over a period of time.
(Or if someone can suggest another option...)
Thanks in advance,
Doug
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-12-2006 10:46 AM
09-12-2006 10:46 AM
SolutionIf you exchange the keys, the transfer is automatic in the background (i.e. via a script or a cron job) vs. having to be prompted for a password with ftp.
There are "aftermarket" ftp programs, but you have to install/compile them on your system.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-12-2006 10:51 AM
09-12-2006 10:51 AM
Re: rcp vs ftp advice
Use s-commands, ssh, scp.
You have to generate and exchange the public keys. It's very simple. Once the keys are exchanged, the authentication happens in the background, and all traffic is encrypted and the passwords are not passed in the open like with telnet and with ftp.
I don't know if encryption has some overhead.
Another option, about rdist?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-12-2006 11:05 AM
09-12-2006 11:05 AM
Re: rcp vs ftp advice
I would rather use file sharing, something like samba.Copying 25gig over network may take significant time. If you create a share using samba, you could just map the drive on the other machine. By this way duplication of data can also be avoided. I have used samba in the past and it is quite stable. Security wise ftp or rcp is no better than samba. You mentioned novell environement, but not clear whether both app and DB servers are Novell. I am assuming that one server is Unix as you have posted the Q in HPUX area.
-PB
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-12-2006 11:08 AM
09-12-2006 11:08 AM
Re: rcp vs ftp advice
My advice is neither.
Though it is a bit slower, scp is the way to go. Encrypted authentication and data stream.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-13-2006 03:04 PM
09-13-2006 03:04 PM
Re: rcp vs ftp advice
ssh is slower due to encription.
tar -cvf - DIRTOSEND|rsh HP_SERVER "(cd /DIRDESTINATION;tar -xvf -)"
This also works well coming from AIX to HPUX
Transfers 5GB in 10 minuets over 2GB lan.
complicated but use variables.
(tarsend)
tar -cvf - $1|rsh $2 "(cd /$3;tar -xvf -)"
tarsend data hpserver newdata
Hewlett Packard Enterprise International
- Communities
- HPE Blogs and Forum
© Copyright 2022 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP