- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- vold.o really required when VxVM isn't used?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-22-2009 04:31 AM
тАО06-22-2009 04:31 AM
vold.o really required when VxVM isn't used?
I found while doing a forums' search for vold.o
that this exceptionally large object file within rootfs was a common suspect for space consuming but probably not really needed files with regard to full / issues.
I am also a bit short of space in / and wonder if we really require this file to be resident in a *build* directory, let alone since we don't use VxVM on this box at all but LVM.
Isn't it common practice that after a build developers usually run a "make clean" when space is scarce and a soon relink with short recompile and processing time isn't really required?
# find / -xdev -type f -size +100000c -exec ll -d {} +|sort -k 5n|tail -3
-rw------- 1 root sys 10806272 Feb 9 11:24 /etc/lvmconf/vgsapz01.conf.old
-rw------- 1 root sys 11071488 Aug 9 2007 /etc/lvmconf/vgZ01.conf
-r-xr-xr-x 1 bin bin 29414983 Nov 4 2006 /etc/vx/static.d/build/vold.o
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-22-2009 04:53 AM
тАО06-22-2009 04:53 AM
Re: vold.o really required when VxVM isn't used?
I would agree with your comments. If space is at a premium, you could always copy the 'void.o' object to another filesystem in the event that you need/want it. I don't use VxVM but it appears to me that your server did at one time, given the 'vgsapz01.conf.old' and 'vgZ01.conf' files (?).
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-22-2009 05:36 AM
тАО06-22-2009 05:36 AM
Re: vold.o really required when VxVM isn't used?
yes, I should get rid of the vgZ01.conf and vgsapz01.conf.old in /etc/lvmconf.
The first dates back to an outdated LVM VG that no longer exists, and the latter is a backup that is available by the host's external backup/archiving anyway.
Interestingly, /etc can also fill up your / FS when you run ServiceGuard and have a lot of Packages an switching activity, and forget about each SG package's own log file.
However, here this is no issue since there is little switching/failing over and hence little logging.
But on other clusters of ours I already thought about symlinking to some logging dir on /var instead.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-22-2009 05:42 AM
тАО06-22-2009 05:42 AM
Re: vold.o really required when VxVM isn't used?
# dmesg|tail -1
msgcnt 1 vxfs: mesg 001: vx_nospace - /dev/root file system full (1 block extent)
I ran a find down /dev but could only see device files and symlinks in there.
Do you have an explenation for the sudden vx_nospace /dev/root message?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-22-2009 12:45 PM
тАО06-22-2009 12:45 PM
Re: vold.o really required when VxVM isn't used?
Why do you say sudden? You have no idea when that message was put into dmesg. Do you have something in syslog.log?
Do you have enough space in / now?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-22-2009 11:04 PM
тАО06-22-2009 11:04 PM
Re: vold.o really required when VxVM isn't used?
I said "sudden" because this message appeared right after I had issued vgcfgbackup.
I only rummaged it up from the dmesg ring buffer since it was shorter to type than grepping for it in syslog.log.
And I have abt. 10 MB still left free on /,
as was the case during the execution of vgcfgbackup (of course plus the abt. 7 MB that are now taken by the /etc/lvmconf/vgsapz01.conf)
Here is the error message's occurrence snipped out from syslog.log with preceding LVM commands for syncing of lvmconf of this shared VG with the primary node's.
Jun 22 13:08:39 warnow LVM[3746]: vgexport vgsapz01
Jun 22 13:13:55 warnow LVM[3929]: vgimport -v -s -m /tmp/vgsapz01.map vgsapz01
Jun 22 13:14:13 warnow LVM[3941]: vgchange -a r vgsapz01
Jun 22 13:14:45 warnow vmunix: msgcnt 1 vxfs: mesg 001: vx_nospace - /dev/root file syst
em full (1 block extent)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-23-2009 02:15 AM
тАО06-23-2009 02:15 AM
Re: vold.o really required when VxVM isn't used?
Ok. And syslog.log shows something similar.
>And I have about 10 MB still left free on /,
as was the case during the execution of vgcfgbackup
I can only assume that vgcfgbackup used up all of your space during that time.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-23-2009 03:15 AM
тАО06-23-2009 03:15 AM
Re: vold.o really required when VxVM isn't used?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-23-2009 03:37 AM
тАО06-23-2009 03:37 AM
Re: vold.o really required when VxVM isn't used?
You are probably aware of this but, remember that the default action for the LVM commands is to backup the volume group configuration into '/etc/lvmconf'. More importantly, the current file for the volume group is renamed with a '.old' suffix' and a new one created. If you are satisfied with the new configuration you could simply remove the '.old' file.
By the way, I misread and mis-spoke earlier when I said "... but it appears to me that your server did at one time, given the 'vgsapz01.conf.old' and 'vgZ01.conf' files...". Had I looked more carefully at the directory that you reported them in, I would have known that they were LVM (not VxVM) related.
Regards!
...JRF...