- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Data Protection and Retention
- >
- StoreEver Tape Storage
- >
- MSL5026 SDLT Problem
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-18-2003 03:51 AM
тАО02-18-2003 03:51 AM
MSL5026 SDLT Problem
Need your help to clarify about MSL5026 SDLT
We have upgraded our system from Windows NT4.0 to Windows2000 server, we used Legato Networker 6.2
We don't know why suddenly the backup speed reduced from 10-15MBPS to 550-700KBPS
Is there anybody knows why could it happened to our system?
thanks and regards,
Ario
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-19-2003 01:32 AM
тАО02-19-2003 01:32 AM
Re: MSL5026 SDLT Problem
It could be that your backup software is still on its default block size after upgrading to windows 2000. The block size for SDLT should be 32k. If this is smaller, then that is why you have performance problems.
HTH,
Vince
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-18-2003 05:00 AM
тАО03-18-2003 05:00 AM
Re: MSL5026 SDLT Problem
You'll find that the problem of performance is resolved if you upgrade the Compaq drivers. Possibly you SCSI driver is and old version and this needs updating.
We use Legato and MSL5026 on W2K and we had this problem. We had to update the drivers, install hotfixes and make a registry hack to make this platform reliable.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-03-2004 07:10 PM
тАО03-03-2004 07:10 PM
Re: MSL5026 SDLT Problem
2Ross: what registry hack have you implemented ?
Saulius
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-17-2005 10:43 PM
тАО08-17-2005 10:43 PM
Re: MSL5026 SDLT Problem
Sorry I'm late at getting back to you.
If your Tape Library is SAN attached that just makes things more tricky to analyse because now you have the FC-HBA driver, firmware to update as a first step and then the FC-HBA config to examine, the NSRs or MDRs to update and examine, the switches to update or examine... to be honest I'm not a SAN expert.
If you still have the problem you needs to ensure you have the latest SCSIPORT.SYS update from Microsoft in place. You need to update your FC-HBA driver and firmware.
Then make sure your Tape and Library drivers are up to date. Make sure the firmware on the Library and tape drive is up to date.
Make sure the fibre channel switch ports are fixed (not auto) and match the speed that your FC-HBAs are running with.
If the memory and CPU status on both backup client and host are in good shape, the file system you are backing up is healthy and you still have the problem you need a SAN expert to examine the config.
Better late that never !
Cheers
Ross
PS. The patch I spoke about on W2K was one to allow more simultaneous sessions to run, this addressed the desktop environment on the backup server and not performance.