- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Data Protection and Retention
- >
- StoreEver Tape Storage
- >
- Ultrium 230 slow reads on variable block lengths
StoreEver Tape Storage
1752646
Members
5705
Online
108788
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2002 06:40 AM
08-12-2002 06:40 AM
Ultrium 230 slow reads on variable block lengths
We are using Ultrium 230 tapes to collect scientific data. The data are recorded by a vendor program with variable block lengths. When we read the data from the tape, performance is very slow -- a full minute for 50 MB.
We have one system running a 1/9 Autoloader under Windows NT4 and another running an external Surestore Ultrium 230 under Linux. Performance is similar on both systems.
It appears that perhaps the poor performance has something to do with delays in the drive firmware and the calls being used to read variable block lengths. While reading, actual tape movement is once every 10 or 20 seconds. This same performance has been demonstrated using a vendor's software (the vendor who wrote the software to write the tapes), it has been demonstrated using Windows NT ReadFile API calls, and it has been demonstrated using NovaStor's TapeCopy application.
I can write the same files to tape using default tape storage parameters and read the files back in about 3 seconds so the problem is not hardware. And the same files that take a minute to read are being written to tape in about 15 seconds.
I am hoping someone can steer me to correct SCSI commands or to mode initialization parameters. Would RecoverBufferedData work to simply dump the tape drive buffer to memory? It is not necessary to preserve the blocked structure physically on the tape and this includes EOF marks.
Thanks
We have one system running a 1/9 Autoloader under Windows NT4 and another running an external Surestore Ultrium 230 under Linux. Performance is similar on both systems.
It appears that perhaps the poor performance has something to do with delays in the drive firmware and the calls being used to read variable block lengths. While reading, actual tape movement is once every 10 or 20 seconds. This same performance has been demonstrated using a vendor's software (the vendor who wrote the software to write the tapes), it has been demonstrated using Windows NT ReadFile API calls, and it has been demonstrated using NovaStor's TapeCopy application.
I can write the same files to tape using default tape storage parameters and read the files back in about 3 seconds so the problem is not hardware. And the same files that take a minute to read are being written to tape in about 15 seconds.
I am hoping someone can steer me to correct SCSI commands or to mode initialization parameters. Would RecoverBufferedData work to simply dump the tape drive buffer to memory? It is not necessary to preserve the blocked structure physically on the tape and this includes EOF marks.
Thanks
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP