HP V1910 Stack Problems

[eduardocalfaia]

Hi guys,

I have a problem, I have two HP V1910 24 and 48 ports with a bridge aggregation (2 ports each one) between them configured, I am trying to configure a stack management but this doesn't work for me, the master doesn't see the slave. After several tests I've discovered that disabling the link aggregation the stack works but I need the link aggregation also. Have someone  had the same problem?

interface GigabitEthernet1/0/23
port link-type hybrid
port hybrid vlan 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 tagged
port hybrid vlan 199 to 200 tagged
port hybrid vlan 1 untagged
stp edged-port enable
port link-aggregation group 1
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24
port link-type hybrid
port hybrid vlan 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 tagged
port hybrid vlan 199 to 200 tagged
port hybrid vlan 1 untagged
stp edged-port enable
port link-aggregation group 1

with Link Aggregation enable:

[stack_0.XXXXX]display stack
Role : Master
Management VLAN : 1
IP Pool : 10.10.10.1/24
Total device number: 1

with link aggregation disable

[stack_0.SW-LEINI-04]display stack
Role : Master
Management VLAN : 1
IP Pool : 10.10.10.1/24
Total device number: 2

Thanks all

[kooper]

Hi eduardocalfaia

Wish I could help as I'm likely going to need to do the same exercise soon.

I'm not entirely sure if it's possible to have link aggregation between two v1910s. Seems like people have had issues with it before:

http://www.edugeek.net/forums/learning-network-manager/100702-help-understanding-irf-stack-through-put.html

https://community.hpe.com/t5/Web-and-Unmanaged/V1910-3com-2952-Link-Aggregation-disrupts-IRF-when-more-than-one/td-p/5374475

Not sure whether it's possible to stack two v1910s over 2 stack ports on either side and having that doing the same thing as link aggregation. Either way, I'd love to know the solution or recommended best practice scenario for this as well.

I'm sure you have it already, but just in case, link to the v1910 user manual.

[parnassus]

Or, from a general standpoint, two questions could be asked:

• Is it possible to have the "Stack for Management" feature and the "Port Trunking" feature (aka Bridge/Link Aggregation) both working concurrently?
• Do these features are mutually exclusive?