- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Web and Unmanaged
- >
- Odd STP related problem in V1910 with a stacked sw...
Web and Unmanaged
1753862
Members
7738
Online
108809
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2019 04:51 AM
02-23-2019 04:51 AM
Odd STP related problem in V1910 with a stacked switch
I have a very straightforward network to deal with, a central switch made up of two stacked Edgecore ecs4510-28F switches feeding 11 V1910-48G switches.
The feeds are dynamic, LACP controlled, LAGs of 4*1G fibre SFPs
At the V1910 end the LAGs are made up of ports 49-52.
At the Edgecore end the LAGs are made up of two ports each from each stack half, e g port1+2 in switch1 + port1+2 in switch2.
The topology is a simple and straightforward star, the 4*1G LAGs connect each V1910 directly to the 4510 stack, and there are no other links between switches. The V1910 rj45 ports connect to individual flats, and the risk of a loop to appear between two flats seems minute, even with Apple style ethernet bridges and wifi leakage.
Now to the problem:
If I enable STP on the MSTP global configuration page in more than one V1910, all but one V1910 will eventually be cut off from the 4510stack.
All I do is enable globally, and all else is default.
What could possibly cause this?
There are no superfluous links, and the topology will never change, but I'm still uneasy about turning STP off, which would, I suppose, solve the problem.
What would be your first thought in a situation like mine?
The feeds are dynamic, LACP controlled, LAGs of 4*1G fibre SFPs
At the V1910 end the LAGs are made up of ports 49-52.
At the Edgecore end the LAGs are made up of two ports each from each stack half, e g port1+2 in switch1 + port1+2 in switch2.
The topology is a simple and straightforward star, the 4*1G LAGs connect each V1910 directly to the 4510 stack, and there are no other links between switches. The V1910 rj45 ports connect to individual flats, and the risk of a loop to appear between two flats seems minute, even with Apple style ethernet bridges and wifi leakage.
Now to the problem:
If I enable STP on the MSTP global configuration page in more than one V1910, all but one V1910 will eventually be cut off from the 4510stack.
All I do is enable globally, and all else is default.
What could possibly cause this?
There are no superfluous links, and the topology will never change, but I'm still uneasy about turning STP off, which would, I suppose, solve the problem.
What would be your first thought in a situation like mine?
Customer Baffling Expert
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP