- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- XP Storage
- >
- Filesystem question with VA7410 vs XP128
XP Storage
1753770
Members
4941
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-01-2008 07:05 AM
тАО07-01-2008 07:05 AM
Re: Filesystem question with VA7410 vs XP128
I don't see how that can happen. A file is a file, regardles how sparse the file is, it should have all the space allocated. There is no such thing as disk level compression of sparse files. (or is there with the XP?)
On the XP side do the numbers add up? In other words if you add the du numbers or the ll numbers do they add up to the overall volume/filesystem size from du and bdf? If you get any oracle downtime, try copying the files while oracle is down.
On the XP side do the numbers add up? In other words if you add the du numbers or the ll numbers do they add up to the overall volume/filesystem size from du and bdf? If you get any oracle downtime, try copying the files while oracle is down.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-01-2008 07:10 AM
тАО07-01-2008 07:10 AM
Re: Filesystem question with VA7410 vs XP128
No, on the XP128 the file sizes for the du and bdf do not add up. They only add up after I do a "cp" command to the VA7410. And the differences are mostly on any temp.dbf datafiles. Probably if I recreate this temp.dbf datafile on the VA7410, the numbers would show a lot less than the 2GB allocated just like the XP128. Weird.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-01-2008 09:54 AM
тАО07-01-2008 09:54 AM
Re: Filesystem question with VA7410 vs XP128
The final resolution is that temp.dbs files are sparse files and they can overcommit the FS. Thanks to all especially TTr, I've learned alot.
- « Previous
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP